The Inclusion of End-of-Life Modeling in the Life Cycle Energy Optimization Methodology

被引:7
作者
Bouchouireb, Hamza [1 ]
Jank, Merle-Hendrikje [2 ]
O'Reilly, Ciaran J. [1 ]
Goransson, Peter [1 ]
Schoeggl, Josef-Peter [3 ]
Baumgartner, Rupert J. [3 ]
Potting, Jose [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Ctr ECO2 Vehicle Design, Dept Engn Mech, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Lab Machine Tools & Prod Engn WZL, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[3] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Christian Doppler Lab Sustainable Prod Management, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[4] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Ctr ECO2 Vehicle Design, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] EnviroSpotting, NL-6707 CS Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
end-of-life modeling; life cycle energy optimization; vehicle design; credit allocation; recycling; conceptual design; design for the environment; design methodology; design optimization; life cycle analysis and design; multidisciplinary design and optimization; sustainable design; CARBON-FIBER COMPOSITES; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; MATERIALS SELECTION; PRODUCT DESIGN; SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; ECODESIGN; TECHNOLOGIES; WASTE;
D O I
10.1115/1.4048447
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In this study, an end-of-life (EOL) model is included in the life cycle energy optimization (LCEO) methodology to account for the energy burdens and credits stemming from a vehicle's EOL processing phase and balance them against the vehicle's functional requirements and production and use-phase energies. The substitution with a correction factor allocation method is used to model the contribution of recycling to the EOL phase's energy. The methodology is illustrated through the optimization of the design of a simplified vehicle subsystem. For the latter, multiple recycling scenarios with varying levels of assumed recycling induced material property degradation were built, and their impact on the vehicle subsystem's optimal solutions was compared to that of scenarios based on landfilling and incineration with energy recovery. The results show that the vehicle subsystem's optimal designs are significantly dependent on the EOL scenario considered. In particular, the optimal designs associated with the recycling scenarios are on average substantially heavier, and less life cycle energy demanding, than their landfilling or incineration with energy recovery-related counterparts, thus demonstrating how the inclusion of EOL modeling in the LCEO methodology can significantly alter material use patterns, thereby effecting the very mechanisms enabling the embodiment of the resulting life cycle energy optimal designs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Scalable Set-Based Design Optimization and Remanufacturing for Meeting Changing Requirements [J].
Al Handawi, Khalil ;
Andersson, Petter ;
Panarotto, Massimo ;
Isaksson, Ola ;
Kokkolaras, Michael .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2021, 143 (02)
[2]  
[Anonymous], DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTI
[3]   Life cycle impact assessment and interpretation of municipal solid waste management scenarios based on the midpoint and endpoint approaches [J].
Yi, Sora ;
Kurisu, Kiyo H. ;
Hanaki, Keisuke .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (07) :652-668
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V269, P34, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2010.02.014
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Official Journal of the European Union, 2008 Council Decision of 14 May 2008 (L131/7)
[6]  
Ashby M.F., 2012, MAT ENV ECO INFORM M, VSecond
[7]   Designing hybrid materials [J].
Ashby, MF ;
Bréchet, YJM .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2003, 51 (19) :5801-5821
[8]   A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process [J].
Bovea, M. D. ;
Perez-Belis, V. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 20 (01) :61-71
[9]  
BREZET H., 1997, ECODESIGN PROMISING
[10]  
Cameron C.J., 2009, INT J VEH STRUCT SYS, V1, P3