An optimisation framework for yard planning in a container terminal: case with automated rail-mounted gantry cranes

被引:36
作者
Ku, Liang Ping [1 ]
Lee, Loo Hay [1 ]
Chew, Ek Peng [1 ]
Tan, Kok Choon [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Singapore 119260, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Dept Decis Sci, Singapore 119260, Singapore
关键词
Automated container terminal; Optimum yard plan; Mathematical programming; IT-based search engine; EXPORT CONTAINERS; SPACE-ALLOCATION; STORAGE SPACE; TRANSSHIPMENT; OPERATIONS; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00291-010-0200-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Different terminals, with their unique combinations of liner services, yard layouts and equipment configurations, may find that different yard planning strategies work better for their scenarios. While an optimum yard plan can be found for each yard planning strategy, it is interesting to know which strategy gives the best plan. In designing an IT-based search engine to discover the best yard planning strategy and/or scenario, having a generic specification and solver is important, so that the whole solution space could be represented and searched. We design a generic problem specification with parameterised scenarios and yard planning strategies, and formulate a generic mathematical model that solves for the optimum weekly yard plan template for that given problem. A good run time of this generic model is extremely important as the model will be executed hundreds of times in the search engine. Experiments are conducted with the model. An interesting discovery is that re-modelling a set of integer variables into multiple binary variables improve the run time tremendously, and in some cases, outperform the relaxed original model. We also find that the strategy which allows sharing of yard space between services yield better utilization for yard space and rail mounted gantry handling capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 541
页数:23
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Simulation and genetic algorithms for ship planning and shipyard layout [J].
Bruzzone, A ;
Signorile, R .
SIMULATION, 1998, 71 (02) :74-83
[2]  
Chen T., 1999, MARITIME POLICY 38 M, V26, P27
[3]  
Chung RK, 2002, TRANSPORT SCI, V36, P79, DOI 10.1287/trsc.36.1.79.568
[4]   HANDLING STRATEGIES FOR IMPORT CONTAINERS AT MARINE TERMINALS [J].
DECASTILHO, B ;
DAGANZO, CF .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1993, 27 (02) :151-166
[5]   Advanced methods for container stacking [J].
Dekker, Rommert ;
Voogd, Patrick ;
van Asperen, Eelco .
OR SPECTRUM, 2006, 28 (04) :563-586
[6]  
Huang W.C., 2004, J MAR SCI TECH-JAPAN, V12, P159
[7]   Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards [J].
Kim, KH ;
Park, YM ;
Ryu, KR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2000, 124 (01) :89-101
[8]   Sequencing delivery and receiving operations for yard cranes in port container terminals [J].
Kim, KH ;
Lee, KM ;
Hwang, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2003, 84 (03) :283-292
[9]   A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers [J].
Kim, KH ;
Park, KT .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 148 (01) :92-101
[10]   The optimal sizing of the storage space and handling facilities for import containers [J].
Kim, KH ;
Kim, HB .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2002, 36 (09) :821-835