Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials in the United States

被引:21
作者
Hall, Marissa G. [1 ,2 ]
Mendel, Jennifer R. [1 ]
Noar, Seth M. [1 ,3 ]
Brewer, Noel T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav, 324 Rosenau Hall CB7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Media & Journalism, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cigarette pack warnings; Pictorial warnings; Avoidance; Defensive processing; Risk messages; Reactance; Fear appeals; Negative affect; HEALTH WARNING LABELS; ADULT SMOKERS; IMPACT; AUSTRALIA; REACTANCE; CESSATION; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.049
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Message avoidance (e.g., trying not to look at the message) may be motivated by reactance, a maladaptive rejection of the message. An alternative view is that avoidance indicates that a message is eliciting fear and other negative affect, thereby increasing the likelihood of behavioral change. We sought to identify which psychological mechanism-reactance or fear and other negative affect-explains message avoidance. We also examined whether avoidance was associated with more forgoing or butting out of cigarettes. Method: Trial 1 randomly assigned 2149 adult U.S. smokers to receive either pictorial warnings (intervention) or text-only warnings (control) on their cigarette packs for four weeks in 2014 and 2015. Trial 2 randomly assigned 719 adult U.S. smokers to receive either messages about toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke (intervention) or messages about not littering cigarette butts (control) for three weeks in 2016 and 2017. Negative affect included fear, anxiety, disgust, sadness, and guilt. Reactance included perceived threat to freedom, anger, and counter-arguing. Results: Intervention messages led to greater message avoidance in both trials (both p < .001). In Trial 1, intervention messages elicited greater negative affect, which in turn was associated with greater avoidance (mediated effect = 0.21, p < .001). In contrast, reactance explained only a small part of the effect in Trial 1 (mediated effect = 0.03, p < .001). Similarly, in Trial 2, intervention messages elicited greater negative affect, which was associated with more avoidance (mediated effect = 0.12, p < .001); reactance did not explain any of the effect. In both trials, avoidance was associated with more forgoing or butting out of cigarettes (ps < .001). Conclusions: Smokers may avoid cigarette pack risk messages because they evoke aversive types of emotion. These studies add to a growing body of evidence that, in the context of cigarette pack messages, avoidance is not a form of defensive processing but instead a sign of deeper processing.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 172
页数:8
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, World Health Report
[4]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[5]   Effect of Graphic Cigarette Warnings on Smoking Intentions in Young Adults [J].
Blanton, Hart ;
Snyder, Leslie B. ;
Strauts, Erin ;
Larson, Joy G. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05)
[6]   Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years [J].
Borland, R. ;
Wilson, N. ;
Fong, G. T. ;
Hammond, D. ;
Cummings, K. M. ;
Yong, H-H ;
Hosking, W. ;
Hastings, G. ;
Thrasher, J. ;
McNeill, A. .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2009, 18 (05) :358-364
[7]   How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four-Country survey [J].
Borland, Ron ;
Yong, Hua-Hie ;
Wilson, Nick ;
Fong, Geoffrey T. ;
Hammond, David ;
Cummings, K. Michael ;
Hosking, Warwick ;
McNeill, Ann .
ADDICTION, 2009, 104 (04) :669-675
[8]  
Brehm J. W., 1966, A theory of psychological reactance
[9]  
Brewer N. T., 2018, CIGARETTE PACK MESSA
[10]  
Brewer N. T., 2018, ANN BEHAV MED