Different types of semi-natural habitat are required to sustain diverse wild bee communities across agricultural landscapes

被引:30
|
作者
Maurer, Corina [1 ,2 ]
Sutter, Louis [3 ]
Martinez-Nunez, Carlos [1 ]
Pellissier, Loiec [2 ,4 ]
Albrecht, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Agroscope, Agroecol & Environm, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Ecol Inst Terr Ecosyst, Landscape Ecol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Agroscope, Plant Prod Syst, Conthey, Switzerland
[4] Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Swiss Fed Inst Forest, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
conservation; landscape complexity; pollinators; semi-natural habitat; species-habitat networks; wild bees; alpha-diversity; beta-diversity; CROP-POLLINATING BEES; COMPONENTS; RESOURCES; NETWORKS; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.14260
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Semi-natural habitats provide important resources for wild bees in agricultural landscapes. Landscapes under management are dynamic and floral resources fluctuate in space and time. Thus, promoting different semi-natural habitat types within landscapes could be key to support diverse bee meta-communities throughout the season. 2. Here, we integrate analyses of alpha-diversity (species richness) and beta-diversity and species-habitat networks to examine the relative contribution of all major semi-natural habitats to wild bee meta-communities in agricultural landscapes. We sampled extensively and conventionally managed meadows, flower strips, hedgerows and forest edges in spring, early and late summer in 25 landscapes in Switzerland. 3. Habitat types varied in their importance for wild bees throughout the season: While extensively managed meadows supported more rare species, habitat specialists and bee species overall than the other habitat types, flower strips were most important later in the season. Each of the five investigated habitat types harboured relatively unique sets of species with different habitats generally acting as distinct modules in the overall bee-habitat network. 4. Not only flower richness in a habitat perse, but also flower-habitat network properties (habitat strength and functional complementarity) were good predictors of wild bee richness. In addition to local floral richness, landscape composition and configuration interactively influenced beta-diversity patterns across habitats. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our study highlights the value of pollinator-habitat network analysis to inform pollinator conservation management at the landscape scale, especially when combined with information on floral resources and flower-habitat networks. Maintaining different types of semi-natural habitats offers diverse and complementary resources throughout the season, which are crucial to sustain diverse wild bee meta-communities in agricultural landscapes. Particularly meadow extensification schemes can play a key role in safeguarding rare and specialist species in these landscapes. While locally a high flower richness promoted bee abundance and richness in general, our results indicate that increasing connectivity between habitat patches in landscapes dominated by arable crops appears to improve species exchange between local bee communities of different habitats, thereby possibly increasing their resilience to disturbances.
引用
收藏
页码:2604 / 2615
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] The potential of different semi-natural habitats to sustain pollinators and natural enemies in European agricultural landscapes
    Bartual, Agustin M.
    Sutter, Louis
    Bocci, Gionata
    Moonen, Anna-Camilla
    Cresswell, James
    Entling, Martin
    Giffard, Brice
    Jacot, Katja
    Jeanneret, Philippe
    Holland, John
    Pfister, Sonja
    Pinter, Orsolya
    Veromann, Eve
    Winkler, Karin
    Albrecht, Matthias
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 279 : 43 - 52
  • [2] Assessing the contribution of lawns and semi-natural meadows to bee, wasp, and flower fly communities across different landscapes
    Cloutier, Sabrina
    Mendes, Poliana
    Cimon-Morin, Jerome
    Pellerin, Stephanie
    Fournier, Valerie
    Poulin, Monique
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2024, 27 (05) : 1417 - 1434
  • [3] Wooded Semi-Natural Habitats Complement Permanent Grasslands in Supporting Wild Bee Diversity in Agricultural Landscapes
    Rivers-Moore, Justine
    Andrieu, Emilie
    Vialatte, Aude
    Ouin, Annie
    INSECTS, 2020, 11 (11) : 1 - 21
  • [4] Semi-natural habitat, but not aphid amount or continuity, predicts lady beetle abundance across agricultural landscapes
    Iuliano, Benjamin
    Gratton, Claudio
    Kim, Tania N.
    Spiesman, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2024, 61 (08) : 1881 - 1893
  • [5] Role of floral strips and semi-natural habitats as enhancers of wild bee functional diversity in intensive agricultural landscapes
    Hevia, Violeta
    Carmona, Carlos P.
    Azcarate, Francisco M.
    Heredia, Roberto
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 319
  • [6] Improving and expanding hedgerows-Recommendations for a semi-natural habitat in agricultural landscapes
    Staley, Joanna T.
    Wolton, Robert
    Norton, Lisa R.
    ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [7] Fruit orchards and woody semi-natural habitat provide complementary resources for pollinators in agricultural landscapes
    Maxime Eeraerts
    Sanne Van Den Berge
    Willem Proesmans
    Kris Verheyen
    Guy Smagghe
    Ivan Meeus
    Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36 : 1377 - 1390
  • [8] Fruit orchards and woody semi-natural habitat provide complementary resources for pollinators in agricultural landscapes
    Eeraerts, Maxime
    Van den Berge, Sanne
    Proesmans, Willem
    Verheyen, Kris
    Smagghe, Guy
    Meeus, Ivan
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (05) : 1377 - 1390
  • [10] A comparison of wild bee communities in sown flower strips and semi-natural habitats: A pollination network approach
    Hadrava, Jiri
    Talasova, Anna
    Straka, Jakub
    Benda, Daniel
    Kazda, Jan
    Klecka, Jan
    INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2022, 15 (03) : 312 - 324