Incentive and informational properties of preference questions

被引:833
作者
Carson, Richard T. [1 ]
Groves, Theodore [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Econ, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
contingent valuation; stated preference surveys; incentive compatibility;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Surveys are frequently used by businesses and governments to elicit information about the public's preferences. They have become the most common way to gather preference information regarding goods, that are not (or are not yet) bought or sold in markets. In this paper we apply the standard neoclassical economic framework to generate predictions about how rational agents would answer such survey questions, which in turn implies how such survey data should be interpreted. In some situations, the standard economic model would be expected to have no predictive power. For situations where it does have predictive power, we compare different survey formats with respect to: (a) the information that the question itself reveals to the respondent, (b) the strategic incentives the respondent faces in answering the question, and (c) the information revealed by the respondent's answer.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 210
页数:30
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]   Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data [J].
Alberini, A ;
Kanninen, B ;
Carson, RT .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1997, 73 (03) :309-324
[3]   EFFICIENCY VS BIAS OF WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY ESTIMATES - BIVARIATE AND INTERVAL-DATA MODELS [J].
ALBERINI, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 29 (02) :169-180
[4]  
[Anonymous], MARKETING SCI, DOI DOI 10.1287/MKSC.5.4.372
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
[6]  
[Anonymous], FRONTIERS ECONOMETRI
[7]  
[Anonymous], DETERMINING VALUE NO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ENV POLICY BENEFITS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, VALUING ENV PREFEREN
[10]  
[Anonymous], ELECTION POLLS NEWS