'Mad', Mad studies and advancing inclusive resistance

被引：41

作者：

Beresford, Peter ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Essex, Citizenship Participat, Colchester, Essex, England

来源：

DISABILITY & SOCIETY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 08期

关键词：

Mad; Mad studies; demedicalising; mental illness; terminology; survivor-led; addressing diversity;

D O I：

10.1080/09687599.2019.1692168

中图分类号：

R49 [康复医学];

学科分类号：

100215 ;

摘要：

'Mad' is a contentious term with which many service users/survivors feel uncomfortable. Yet it is the framework for a major new user-led challenge to bio-medical thinking about distress - Mad Studies - which is coming in for criticism for this and other identified shortcomings. Why has it adopted this controversial, conflict-ridden title? This article will explore current criticisms and raise the question of what Mad Studies' strategy should be to address them for the future?

引用

页码：1337 / 1342

页数：6

共 9 条

[1]

Beresford P., 2020, DOING MAD STUDIES CR

[2]

Beresford P., 2016, MENTAL ILLNESS SOCIA

[3] Supporting the sustainability of Mad Studies and preventing its co-option [J].