Components of attentional bias for food cues among restrained eaters

被引:100
作者
Hollitt, Sarah [1 ]
Kemps, Eva [1 ]
Tiggemann, Marika [1 ]
Smeets, Elke [2 ]
Mills, Jennifer S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Clin Psychol Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] York Univ, Dept Psychol, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Attentional bias; Dietary restraint; Food cues; Odd-one-out visual search task; Speeded detection; BODY SHAPE WORDS; WORKING-MEMORY; DIETARY RESTRAINT; EATING-DISORDERS; PREOCCUPYING COGNITIONS; INCREASED DISTRACTION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPEEDED DETECTION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.appet.2009.12.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The study aimed to investigate attentional bias for food cues among restrained eaters. In particular, the roles of speeded detection (enhanced orientation of attention toward food stimuli) and slowed disengagement (trouble disengaging attention from food stimuli) were examined. Participants were 78 female undergraduate students aged 18-25 years, classified as restrained (N = 38) or unrestrained eaters (N = 40). Attentional bias was assessed by a visual search task which required participants to locate the position of an odd-one-out target word in a matrix of 19 distractor words. Restrained eaters were disproportionately faster than unrestrained eaters to detect a food word within a neutral matrix compared to a neutral word within a neutral distractor matrix. Restrained eaters were also disproportionately faster, rather than slower, than unrestrained eaters to detect a neutral word within a food matrix compared to a neutral word within a neutral distractor matrix. Thus restrained eaters show a heightened vigilance for food cues, but no slower disengagement from such cues. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 313
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Allison D.B., 1992, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V4, P391, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.3.391
[2]  
Appleton K M, 2006, Eat Behav, V7, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2005.11.008
[3]   Dieting, weight, and health: Reconceptualizing research and policy [J].
Cogan, JC ;
Ernsberger, P .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1999, 55 (02) :187-205
[4]  
Faunce Gavin J, 2002, Eat Disord, V10, P125
[5]   Dietary restraint and the selective processing of forbidden and nonforbidden food words [J].
Francis, JA ;
Stewart, SH ;
Hounsell, S .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1997, 21 (06) :633-646
[6]  
GREEN MW, 1993, INT J EAT DISORDER, V14, P515, DOI 10.1002/1098-108X(199312)14:4<515::AID-EAT2260140417>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-E
[8]   Impairments in working memory associated with naturalistic dieting in women: no relationship between task performance and urinary 5-HIAA levels [J].
Green, MW ;
Jones, AD ;
Smith, ID ;
Cobain, MR ;
Williams, JMG ;
Healy, H ;
Cowen, PJ ;
Powell, J ;
Durlach, PJ .
APPETITE, 2003, 40 (02) :145-153
[9]   Impaired cognitive processing in dieters: Failure of attention focus or resource capacity limitation? [J].
Green, MW ;
Elliman, NA ;
Rogers, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 2 :259-267
[10]   Impairments in working memory associated with spontaneous dieting behaviour [J].
Green, MW ;
Rogers, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (05) :1063-1070