The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: Performance and event-related potential indices

被引:161
作者
Johnstone, Stuart J.
Dimoska, Aneta
Smith, Janette L.
Barry, Robert J.
Pleffer, Carly B.
Chiswick, Dale
Clarke, Adam R.
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Psychol, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Brain & Behav Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
FRP; response inhibition; children; development; stop-signal; Go/Nogo;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.07.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study examined the development of response inhibition during the Stop-signal and Go/Nogo tasks in children using performance and ERP measures. Twenty-four children aged 7 to 12 years completed both tasks, each with an auditory Nogo/Stop-signal presented on 30% of trials. On average, response inhibition was more difficult in the Stop-signal than Go/Nogo task. Response inhibition performance did not develop significantly across the age range, while response execution varied significantly in a task dependent manner (Go/Nogo: increasing accuracy and reducing response variability with age; Stop-signal: reducing Go mean reaction time and response variability with age). The N1, P2, N.2 and P3 components showed different scalp distributions, with N1 and P2 peaking earlier, and P3 later, in Nogo compared to Stop stimuli. N2 and P3 amplitude were positively correlated with successful inhibition probability in the Go/Nogo task only. N2 amplitude and latency to both Nogo and successful Stop stimuli decreased linearly with age, but not in the frontal regions. N1 and P3 amplitude in the parietal region increased with age for Stop-signals. An age-related reduction in P3 latency to Nogo stimuli correlated significantly with reduced RT and variability in Go responding, indicating a relationship between efficient Nogo and Go processing. Together the behavioural and ER-P results suggest little development of the response inhibition process as measured via the Stop-signal and Go/Nogo tasks across the 7 to 12 year age range, while response execution processes develop substantially. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 38
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EMERGING THEMES COGN
[2]   The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: Separate developmental trends [J].
Band, GPH ;
van der Molen, MW ;
Overtoom, CCE ;
Verbaten, MN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 75 (04) :263-290
[3]   Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms [J].
Band, GPH ;
van Boxtel, GJM .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :179-211
[4]  
BAND GPH, 1997, THESIS U AMSTERDAM N
[5]  
Barkley RA, 1997, J DEV BEHAV PEDIATR, V18, P271
[6]   The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span [J].
Bedard, AC ;
Nichols, S ;
Barbosa, JA ;
Schachar, R ;
Logan, GD ;
Tannock, R .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 21 (01) :93-111
[7]   Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task [J].
Bekker, EM ;
Kenemans, JL ;
Verbaten, MN .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 22 (02) :221-231
[8]   The pure electrophysiology of stopping [J].
Bekker, EM ;
Kenemans, JL ;
Hoeksma, MR ;
Talsma, D ;
Verbaten, MN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (02) :191-198
[9]  
Bjorklund David F., 1995, P141, DOI 10.1016/B978-012208930-5/50006-4
[10]   Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task [J].
Bokura, H ;
Yamaguchi, S ;
Kobayashi, S .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (12) :2224-2232