Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors

被引:6
|
作者
Kim, Hongsik [1 ]
Jung, Hyun Ae [1 ]
Lee, Se-Hoon [1 ]
Ahn, Jin Seok [1 ]
Ahn, Myung-Ju [1 ]
Park, Keunchil [1 ]
Sun, Jong-Mu [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol,Sch Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA); repeat tests; acquired resistance; OPEN-LABEL; OSIMERTINIB; GEFITINIB; ERLOTINIB; AFATINIB; THERAPY;
D O I
10.21037/tlcr-20-1128
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients acquire resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We comprehensively evaluated the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test. Methods: We screened NSCLC patients who had a plasma EGFR test upon acquiring resistance to first or second-generation EGFR inhibitors. Plasma EGFR tests were performed with the EGFR mutation test. Results: A total of 355 patients were tested for plasma EGFR mutations, and T790M was detected in 83 patients (23%). Of 79 patients who were tested multiple times, T790M was newly detected in 13 subsequent plasma tests. When initial plasma tests did not detect any EGFR mutation types, the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tests was very low (9%, 5/56), while detection rates of T790M in subsequent tests increased (35%, 8/23) in those individuals in whom sensitizing mutations had been detected in the initial plasma test (P=0.005). Paired plasma and tissue EGFR test results were available for 235 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the plasma tests for T790M were 14% and 87%, respectively. Among 235 patients, 140 patients had tissue EGFR tests performed after T790M-negative plasma results were reported. The subsequent tissue test detected T790M in 61% (44/72) of these patients when any EGFR mutations were not detected in prior plasma tests, while the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tissue tests was 37% (25/68) when sensitizing mutations were detected in prior plasma tests (P=0.004). Conclusions: Because the sensitivity of plasma EGFR test for T790M is low, follow-up tissue or plasma tests are necessary. Presence or absence of a sensitizing mutation in the initial plasma tests can be used to determine which samples (tissue or plasma) should be submitted for further testing. Background: Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients acquire resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We comprehensively evaluated the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test. Methods: We screened NSCLC patients who had a plasma EGFR test upon acquiring resistance to first or second-generation EGFR inhibitors. Plasma EGFR tests were performed with the EGFR mutation test. Results: A total of 355 patients were tested for plasma EGFR mutations, and T790M was detected in 83 patients (23%). Of 79 patients who were tested multiple times, T790M was newly detected in 13 subsequent plasma tests. When initial plasma tests did not detect any EGFR mutation types, the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tests was very low (9%, 5/56), while detection rates of T790M in subsequent tests increased (35%, 8/23) in those individuals in whom sensitizing mutations had been detected in the initial plasma test (P=0.005). Paired plasma and tissue EGFR test results were available for 235 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the plasma tests for T790M were 14% and 87%, respectively. Among 235 patients, 140 patients had tissue EGFR tests performed after T790M-negative plasma results were reported. The subsequent tissue test detected T790M in 61% (44/72) of these patients when any EGFR mutations were not detected in prior plasma tests, while the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tissue tests was 37% (25/68) when sensitizing mutations were detected in prior plasma tests (P=0.004). Conclusions: Because the sensitivity of plasma EGFR test for T790M is low, follow-up tissue or plasma tests are necessary. Presence or absence of a sensitizing mutation in the initial plasma tests can be used to determine which samples (tissue or plasma) should be submitted for further testing.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 888
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness analysis of the first-line EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer
    Aguilar-Serra, J.
    Gimeno-Ballester, V
    Pastor-Clerigues, A.
    Milara, J.
    Trigo-Vicente, C.
    Cortijo, J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (04) : 637 - 646
  • [32] Budget Impact Analysis of afatinib for first-line treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with uncommon EGFR mutations
    Pompilio, Giuseppe
    Morabito, Alessandro
    Cortinovis, Diego L.
    Integlia, Davide
    GLOBAL & REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2022, 9 : 22 - 29
  • [33] Challenges in the Management of EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Acquired Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
    Kuiper, Justine L.
    Smit, Egbert F.
    ONCOLOGY, 2014, 87 (02) : 83 - 94
  • [34] Are EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors effective in elderly patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer?
    Roviello, Giandomenico
    Zanotti, Laura
    Cappelletti, Maria Rosa
    Gobbi, Angela
    Dester, Martina
    Paganini, Giovanni
    Pacifico, Chiara
    Generali, Daniele
    Roudi, Raheleh
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 18 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [35] First-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutation: is combined EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy a better choice?
    Wang, Shuyun
    Gao, Aiqin
    Liu, Jie
    Sun, Yuping
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 81 (03) : 443 - 453
  • [36] Variations in EGFR ctDNA Correlates to the Clinical Efficacy of Afatinib in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer with Acquired Resistance
    He, Jinfeng
    Tan, Wei
    Tang, Xuelian
    Ma, Jingping
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (02) : 307 - 315
  • [37] First-line osimertinib for poor performance status patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective observational study
    Igawa, Satoshi
    Fukui, Tomoya
    Kasajima, Masashi
    Ono, Taihei
    Ozawa, Takahiro
    Kakegawa, Mikiko
    Kusuhara, Seiichiro
    Sato, Takashi
    Nakahara, Yoshiro
    Hisashi, Mitsufuji
    Sasaki, Jiichiro
    Naoki, Katsuhiko
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2022, 40 (02) : 430 - 437
  • [38] Genomic landscape of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR T790M-mutant non-small cell lung cancer
    Lee, Jiyun
    Kim, Hong Sook
    Lee, Boram
    Kim, Hee Kyung
    Sun, Jong-Mu
    Ahn, Jin Seok
    Ahn, Myung-Ju
    Park, Keunchil
    Lee, Se-Hoon
    CANCER, 2020, 126 (11) : 2704 - 2712
  • [39] Clinical Predictors of Response to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Fukihara, Jun
    Watanabe, Naohiro
    Taniguchi, Hiroyuki
    Kondoh, Yasuhiro
    Kimura, Tomoki
    Kataoka, Kensuke
    Matsuda, Toshiaki
    Yokoyama, Toshiki
    Hasegawa, Yoshinori
    ONCOLOGY, 2014, 86 (02) : 86 - 93
  • [40] Resistance to EGFR inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical management and future perspectives
    Tomasello, Chiara
    Baldessari, Cinzia
    Napolitano, Martina
    Orsi, Giulia
    Grizzi, Giulia
    Bertolini, Federica
    Barbieri, Fausto
    Cascinu, Stefano
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2018, 123 : 149 - 161