Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test in non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors

被引:6
|
作者
Kim, Hongsik [1 ]
Jung, Hyun Ae [1 ]
Lee, Se-Hoon [1 ]
Ahn, Jin Seok [1 ]
Ahn, Myung-Ju [1 ]
Park, Keunchil [1 ]
Sun, Jong-Mu [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol,Sch Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA); repeat tests; acquired resistance; OPEN-LABEL; OSIMERTINIB; GEFITINIB; ERLOTINIB; AFATINIB; THERAPY;
D O I
10.21037/tlcr-20-1128
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients acquire resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We comprehensively evaluated the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test. Methods: We screened NSCLC patients who had a plasma EGFR test upon acquiring resistance to first or second-generation EGFR inhibitors. Plasma EGFR tests were performed with the EGFR mutation test. Results: A total of 355 patients were tested for plasma EGFR mutations, and T790M was detected in 83 patients (23%). Of 79 patients who were tested multiple times, T790M was newly detected in 13 subsequent plasma tests. When initial plasma tests did not detect any EGFR mutation types, the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tests was very low (9%, 5/56), while detection rates of T790M in subsequent tests increased (35%, 8/23) in those individuals in whom sensitizing mutations had been detected in the initial plasma test (P=0.005). Paired plasma and tissue EGFR test results were available for 235 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the plasma tests for T790M were 14% and 87%, respectively. Among 235 patients, 140 patients had tissue EGFR tests performed after T790M-negative plasma results were reported. The subsequent tissue test detected T790M in 61% (44/72) of these patients when any EGFR mutations were not detected in prior plasma tests, while the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tissue tests was 37% (25/68) when sensitizing mutations were detected in prior plasma tests (P=0.004). Conclusions: Because the sensitivity of plasma EGFR test for T790M is low, follow-up tissue or plasma tests are necessary. Presence or absence of a sensitizing mutation in the initial plasma tests can be used to determine which samples (tissue or plasma) should be submitted for further testing. Background: Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients acquire resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We comprehensively evaluated the clinical utility of plasma EGFR test. Methods: We screened NSCLC patients who had a plasma EGFR test upon acquiring resistance to first or second-generation EGFR inhibitors. Plasma EGFR tests were performed with the EGFR mutation test. Results: A total of 355 patients were tested for plasma EGFR mutations, and T790M was detected in 83 patients (23%). Of 79 patients who were tested multiple times, T790M was newly detected in 13 subsequent plasma tests. When initial plasma tests did not detect any EGFR mutation types, the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tests was very low (9%, 5/56), while detection rates of T790M in subsequent tests increased (35%, 8/23) in those individuals in whom sensitizing mutations had been detected in the initial plasma test (P=0.005). Paired plasma and tissue EGFR test results were available for 235 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the plasma tests for T790M were 14% and 87%, respectively. Among 235 patients, 140 patients had tissue EGFR tests performed after T790M-negative plasma results were reported. The subsequent tissue test detected T790M in 61% (44/72) of these patients when any EGFR mutations were not detected in prior plasma tests, while the detection rate of T790M in subsequent tissue tests was 37% (25/68) when sensitizing mutations were detected in prior plasma tests (P=0.004). Conclusions: Because the sensitivity of plasma EGFR test for T790M is low, follow-up tissue or plasma tests are necessary. Presence or absence of a sensitizing mutation in the initial plasma tests can be used to determine which samples (tissue or plasma) should be submitted for further testing.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 888
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapy in advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: strategies to improve clinical outcome
    Tiefenbacher, Andreas
    Pirker, Robert
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (11) : 4208 - 4211
  • [22] Preventing and treating brain metastases with three first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Su, Po-Lan
    Wu, Yi-Lin
    Chang, Wei-Yuan
    Ho, Chung-Liang
    Tseng, Yau-Lin
    Lai, Wu-Wei
    Su, Wu-Chou
    Lin, Chien-Chung
    Yang, Szu-Chun
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 10
  • [23] Study of Gefitinib and Pemetrexed as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutation
    An, Chaolun
    Zhang, Jiajun
    Chu, Hongjun
    Gu, Chunyan
    Xiao, Feng
    Zhu, Fengwei
    Lu, Rujian
    Shi, Hai
    Zhang, Hongfei
    Yi, Xin
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (04) : 763 - 768
  • [24] The efficacy of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with co-medications in Asian patients with EGFR mutation non-small cell lung cancer
    Su, Vincent Yi-Fong
    Yang, Kuang-Yao
    Huang, Ting-Yu
    Hsu, Chia-Chen
    Chen, Yuh-Min
    Yen, Jiin-Cherng
    Chou, Yueh-Ching
    Chang, Yuh-Lih
    He, Chien-Hui
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [25] Osimertinib As First-Line Treatment of EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Ramalingam, Suresh S.
    Yang, James C-H
    Lee, Chee Khoon
    Kurata, Takayasu
    Kim, Dong-Wan
    John, Thomas
    Nogami, Naoyuki
    Ohe, Yuichiro
    Mann, Helen
    Rukazenkov, Yuri
    Ghiorghiu, Serban
    Stetson, Daniel
    Markovets, Aleksandra
    Barrett, J. Carl
    Thress, Kenneth S.
    Janne, Pasi A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 841 - +
  • [26] Sequencing of therapy following first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer
    Park, Keunchil
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    Boyer, Michael
    Hida, Toyoaki
    Hirsh, Vera
    Kato, Terufumi
    Lug, Shun
    Mok, Tony
    Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
    O'Byrne, Kenneth
    Paz-Ares, Luis
    Schuler, Martin
    Sibilotru, Denis Moro
    Tan, Eng-Huat
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    We, Yi-Long
    Yang, James C-H
    Zhang, Li
    Zhou, Caicun
    Maerten, Angela
    Tang, Wenbo
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    LUNG CANCER, 2019, 132 : 126 - 131
  • [27] Second-generation EGFR and ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer
    Wang, Shouzheng
    Li, Junling
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2019, 12 : 6535 - 6548
  • [29] Efficacy and acquired resistance of EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting
    Wang, Qianqian
    Gao, Wen
    Gao, Fangyan
    Jin, Shidai
    Qu, Tianyu
    Lin, Fan
    Zhang, Chen
    Zhang, Jingya
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Chen, Liang
    Guo, Renhua
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [30] Dacomitinib as first-line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer
    Reungwetwattana, Thanyanan
    Rohatgi, Nitesh
    Mok, Tony S.
    Prabhash, Kumar
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 6 (03): : 161 - 171