The use of prolotherapy in the sacroiliac joint

被引:43
作者
Cusi, M. [1 ]
Saunders, J. [2 ]
Hungerford, B. [3 ]
Wisbey-Roth, T. [4 ]
Lucas, P. [2 ]
Wilson, S.
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Sydney Sch Med, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sports Med Programs, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sydney Spine & Pelvis Physiotherapy Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Take Control Act Rehab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
BACK-PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; EXERCISES;
D O I
10.1136/bjsm.2007.042044
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objective: In this study the effectiveness of prolotherapy in the treatment of deficient load transfer of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was determined. Design: A prospective descriptive study. Setting: Authors' private practice. Participants: 25 patients who consented to treatment and attended for at least one follow-up visit and assessment. Study period: From April 2004 to July 2007. Intervention: Three injections of hypertonic dextrose solution into the dorsal interosseous ligament of the affected SIJ, under CT control, 6 weeks apart. Main outcome measures: Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, Roland-Morris 24, Roland-Morris 24 Multiform questionnaires and clinical examination by two authors independently. Results: All patients included in this study attended at least one follow-up visit at 3, 12 or 24 months.. The number of patients at follow-up decreased at 12 and 24 months. Functional questionnaires demonstrated significant improvements for those followed-up at 3, 12 and 24 months (p < 0.05). Clinical scores showed significant improvement from commencement to 3, 12 and 24 months (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This descriptive study of prolotherapy in private practice has shown positive clinical outcomes for the 76% of patients who attended the 3-month follow-up visit (76% at 12 months and 32% at 24 months). Similar results were found in the questionnaires (Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, Roland-Morris 24 and Roland-Morris 24 Multiform questionnaires) at 3, 12 and 24 months.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 104
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Banks A., 1991, J Orthop Med. (UK), V13, P54
[2]  
Dagenais Simon, 2005, Spine J, V5, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.011
[3]   Sacroiliac joint pain [J].
Dreyfuss, P ;
Dreyer, SJ ;
Cole, A ;
Mayo, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2004, 12 (04) :255-265
[4]   SACROILIAC JOINT - PAIN REFERRAL MAPS UPON APPLYING A NEW INJECTION ARTHROGRAPHY TECHNIQUE .2. CLINICAL-EVALUATION [J].
FORTIN, JD ;
APRILL, CN ;
PONTHIEUX, B ;
PIER, J .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (13) :1483-1489
[5]  
Fortin Joseph D, 2003, Pain Physician, V6, P269
[6]  
GOVE P, 2002, 3 NEW INT DICT UNABR
[7]  
Hackett G., 1958, Ligament Tendon Relaxation (Skeletal Disability) - Treated by Prolotherapy, (Fibro-osseous Proliferation), V3rd
[8]   Evidence of altered lumbopelvic muscle recruitment in the presence of sacroiliac joint pain [J].
Hungerford, B ;
Gilleard, W ;
Hodges, P .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (14) :1593-1600
[9]   Evaluation of the ability of physical therapists to palpate intrapelvic motion with the stork test on the support side [J].
Hungerford, Barbara A. ;
Gilleard, Wendy ;
Moran, Michael ;
Emmerson, Cathryn .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 87 (07) :879-887
[10]  
Klein RG, 1997, J MUSCULOSKELETAL ME, V14, P45