Impact of transit-oriented development policy scenarios on travel demand measures of mode share, trip distance and highway usage in Maryland

被引:8
作者
Wang, Yanli [1 ]
Welch, Timothy F. [2 ]
Wu, Bing [1 ]
Ye, Xin [1 ]
Ducca, Frederick W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Ctr Qual Growth & Reg Dev, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Transportat Policy Res Grp, Natl Ctr Smart Growth Res & Educ, College Pk, MD 20741 USA
关键词
transit-oriented development; travel demand measure; land use; transit mode share; average trip distance; vehicle miles traveled; LAND-USE; URBAN;
D O I
10.1007/s12205-016-0618-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper aims to evaluate and compare impacts of two alternative Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) policies, concentrating growth of population or employment opportunities in transit service area, on travel demand measures of mode share, trip distance and highway usage. A validated Maryland Statewide Transportation Model (MSTM) is employed to forecast changes in travel demand measures under various TOD policy scenarios in a future year of 2030. The model simulation results show either concentrating population or employment policy has similar impacts on raising transit mode share and reducing auto mode share. However, concentrating population policy decreases average trip distance while concentrating employment policy increases it. Consequently, concentrating population policy reduces highway usage, measured by Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), more effectively than concentrating employment policy in this specific region given the existing land use pattern. The findings in this paper have important implications to urban planners, transportation planners and decision makers in Maryland of US. The paper also provides a good example for applying a travel demand model to evaluate and compare alternative TOD policies based on travel demand measures.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1016
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, TRANSIT METROPOLIS G
[2]  
Calthorpe P., 1993, The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream
[3]  
Cervero R., 2004, TRANSIT ORIENTED DEV
[4]  
Cervero R., 2002, TCRP RES RESULTS DIG, P10
[5]   Rail and Property Development in Hong Kong: Experiences and Extensions [J].
Cervero, Robert ;
Murakami, Jin .
URBAN STUDIES, 2009, 46 (10) :2019-2043
[6]  
Dittmar H., 2003, The new transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development
[7]   Smart growth and development reality: The difficult co-ordination of land use and transport objectives [J].
Filion, Pierre ;
McSpurren, Kathleen .
URBAN STUDIES, 2007, 44 (03) :501-523
[8]   IS THE JOURNEY TO WORK EXPLAINED BY URBAN STRUCTURE [J].
GIULIANO, G ;
SMALL, KA .
URBAN STUDIES, 1993, 30 (09) :1485-1500
[9]   Transit Oriented Development. Making it Happen [J].
Hesse, Markus .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 17 (06) :510-510
[10]   Transit Oriented Development in Copenhagen, Denmark: from the Finger Plan to Orestad [J].
Knowles, Richard D. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 22 :251-261