Volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for tube current modulation (TCM) in CT scanning

被引:21
作者
Anam, C. [1 ,2 ]
Haryanto, F. [2 ]
Widita, R. [2 ]
Arif, I [2 ]
Dougherty, G. [3 ]
McLean, D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Diponegoro Univ, Dept Phys, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Semarang, Indonesia
[2] Bandung Inst Technol, Dept Phys, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Bandung, Indonesia
[3] Calif State Univ Channel Isl, Dept Appl Phys & Med Imaging, Camarillo, CA 93012 USA
[4] Canberra Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Radiat Engn, Garran, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH | 2018年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol); size-specific dose estimate (SSDE); water equivalent diameter (D-w); tube current modulation (TCM); AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; PATIENT SIZE; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; CHEST CT; REDUCTION; IMAGES; DOSIMETRY; PHANTOM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.16.2.289
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: In the tube current modulation (TCM) technique, tube current is changed dynamically during the scanning process. To quantify the effect of a dynamic tube current, a distinct calculator is needed to estimate the CT output radiation dose in terms of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and individual patient dose in terms of size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). This study developed a specific calculator for CT scanning using the TCM technique. Materials and Methods : The tube current was extracted from the DICOM header for every slice, and averaged over the scan length. The water equivalent diameter (D-w) and SSDE values were calculated for each tube rotation. The software was retrospectively applied to 57 patients who had undergone abdominal and thoracic CT examinations using a multi -detector CT, the Somatom Emotion 6. Results: The differences between the calculated CTDIvol and the CTDIvol reported by the CT scanner were 4.4 +/- 1.2% and 6.0 +/- 2.0% for abdominal and thoracic examinations, respectively. The average tube current was found to be linearly correlated with D-w with R-2 values of 0.707 and 0.696 for abdominal and thoracic examinations, respectively. The average tube current was also linearly and strongly correlated with the SSDE with R-2 values of 0.941 and 0.887 for abdominal and thoracic examinations, respectively. Conclusion: Calculator for estimating CTDIvol and SSDE specifically for TCM in CT scanning has been successfully developed. The difference between calculated CTDI(vol )values using this calculator and reported CIDIvol values were less than 10%.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 297
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
*AAPM, 1993, 39 AAPM
[2]  
AAPM, 2008, 96 AAPM
[3]   A fully automated calculation of size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in thoracic and head CT examinations [J].
Anam, C. ;
Haryanto, F. ;
Widita, R. ;
Arif, I. ;
Dougherty, G. .
13TH SOUTH-EAST ASIAN CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS 2015 (SEACOMP), 2016, 694
[4]   Profile of CT scan output dose in axial and helical modes using convolution [J].
Anam, C. ;
Haryanto, F. ;
Widita, R. ;
Arif, I. ;
Dougherty, G. .
13TH SOUTH-EAST ASIAN CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS 2015 (SEACOMP), 2016, 694
[5]  
Anam C., 2015, ADV SCI ENG MED, V7, P892, DOI DOI 10.1166/ASEM.2015.1780
[6]   The impact of patient table on size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) [J].
Anam, Choirul ;
Haryanto, Freddy ;
Widita, Rena ;
Arif, Idam ;
Dougherty, Geoff ;
McLean, Donald .
AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (01) :153-158
[7]   Automated Calculation of Water-equivalent Diameter (DW) Based on AAPM Task Group 220 [J].
Anam, Choirul ;
Haryanto, Freddy ;
Widita, Rena ;
Arif, Idam ;
Dougherty, Geoff .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (04) :320-333
[8]   New Noise Reduction Method for Reducing CT Scan Dose: Combining Wiener Filtering and Edge Detection Algorithm [J].
Anam, Choirul ;
Haryanto, Freddy ;
Widita, Rena ;
Arif, Idam .
5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES (ICMNS 2014), 2015, 1677
[9]   CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices [J].
Bauhs, John A. ;
Vrieze, Thomas J. ;
Primak, Andrew N. ;
Bruesewitz, Michael R. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (01) :245-253
[10]  
Boone J.M., 2011, SIZE SPECIFIC DOSE E