What drives public acceptance of chemical industrial park policy and project in China?

被引:43
作者
He, Guizhen [1 ,2 ]
Boas, Ingrid J. C. [3 ]
Mol, Arthur P. J. [3 ]
Lu, Yonglong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Shuangqing Rd 18, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 101407, Peoples R China
[3] Wageningen Univ, Environm Policy Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Public acceptance; Chemical industrial park; Industrial policy; China; RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES; OFFSHORE WIND FARMS; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; POWER DEVELOPMENT; GREAT-BASIN; TRUST; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Chemical industrial park (CIP) policy is becoming a vital national strategy of circular economy in China and a means to enhance energy and resource efficiency, environmental performance, and economic competitiveness. It also aims to avoid environmental risks of the decentralized chemical plants that have been a subject of public protests as local citizens' fear for chemical pollution and human's health. Public acceptance is therefore a major factor determining the success of CIP policy and project. This paper aims to investigate what drives public acceptance and rejection of chemical industrial park policies and projects in China. Our focus is on citizens in three coastal cities located in high environmental and risk sensitive areas: Dalian at Liaoning Province, Maoming at Guangdong Province, and Xiamen at Fujian Province. This is where several chemical industrial parks are (proposed) located. Based on surveys in these three representative cities, we have examined the nature and level of public acceptance towards chemical industrial park policies and projects. Results show that respondents were more positive towards the national policy, but more negative of CIP policy at the city and project level. Public acceptance of CIP policy and project was significantly influenced by factors including income, environmental value, perceived risks, procedural justice, distributive justice, benefits of CIP, and the residential distance to a CIP project. The identified factors provide a basis for anticipating and understanding likely public acceptance and should be considered in decision-making of CIP policy and project.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area [J].
Achillas, Ch. ;
Vlachokostas, Ch. ;
Moussiopoulos, N. ;
Banias, G. ;
Kafetzopoulos, G. ;
Karagiannidis, A. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2011, 55 (9-10) :857-863
[2]  
[Anonymous], J BUS CHEM
[3]   What's in store: Lessons from implementing CCS [J].
Ashworth, Peta ;
Bradbury, Judith ;
Wade, Sarah ;
Feenstra, C. F. J. Ynke ;
Greenberg, Sallie ;
Hund, Gretchen ;
Mikunda, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 9 :402-409
[4]   From research to action: Now we have to move on CCS communication [J].
Ashworth, Peta ;
Boughen, Naomi ;
Mayhew, Melissa ;
Millar, Frances .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2010, 4 (02) :426-433
[5]   Are risk or benefit perceptions more important for public acceptance of innovative food technologies: A meta-analysis [J].
Bearth, Angela ;
Siegrist, Michael .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 49 :14-23
[6]  
Beck Ulrich., 2016, METAMORPHOSIS WORLD
[7]   Evaluation model for safety capacity of chemical industrial park based on acceptable regional risk [J].
Chen, Guohua ;
Wang, Shukun ;
Tan, Xiaoqun .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 23 (01) :121-127
[8]   Issues of social acceptance on biofuel development [J].
Chin, Hon-Choong ;
Choong, Weng-Wai ;
Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan ;
Mohammed, Abdul Hakim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 71 :30-39
[9]   Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development [J].
Cowell, Richard ;
Bristow, Gill ;
Munday, Max .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 54 (04) :539-557
[10]   UNDERSTANDING AND OVERCOMING THE NIMBY SYNDROME [J].
DEAR, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1992, 58 (03) :288-300