Compliance with the surgical safety checklist in Switzerland: an observational multicenter study based on self-reported data

被引:3
作者
Fridrich, Annemarie [1 ]
Imhof, Anita [1 ]
Schwappach, David L. B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Patient Safety Fdn, Asylstr 77, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med ISPM, Mittelstr 43, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Checklist; Compliance; Patient safety; Surgery; Measurement methods;
D O I
10.1186/s13037-022-00327-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Since publication of the surgical safety checklist by the WHO in 2009, it has been introduced in many hospitals. However, frequency and quality of surgical safety checklist use is often low probably limiting the effectiveness of the checklist in preventing patient harm. The focus of this study was to examine the current state of compliance with the surgical safety checklist in Switzerland and to evaluate how the data relates to international comparative data. Methods Between November 2020 and March 2021 twelve hospitals with 15 sites collected for at least 200 surgical interventions each whether the three sections of the surgical safety checklist (Sign In, Team Time Out, Sign Out) have been applied. This data collection was part of a large quality improvement project focusing on measuring and improving compliance with the surgical safety checklist via peer observation and feedback. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data; chi-square tests were used to compare sub-samples. Results The hospitals collected valid compliance data for 8622 surgical interventions. Mean compliance rate was 91% when distinguishing between the two categories applied (including partially applied) and not applied. In line with previous research, Sign In (93%) and Team Time Out (94%) sections have been applied more frequently than Sign Out (86%). All three surgical safety checklist sections have been applied in 79% of the surgical interventions, no sections in 1%. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that the overall application of the surgical safety checklist in Switzerland can be considered high, although the completeness, especially of the Sign Out section, could be improved. At present, it seems difficult to compare compliance rates from different studies as measurement methods and definitions of compliance vary widely. A systematization and homogenization of the methodology within, but also beyond, national borders is desirable for the future.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abbott, T. E. F.
    Ahmad, T.
    Phull, M. K.
    Fowler, A. J.
    Hewson, R.
    Biccard, B. M.
    Chew, M. S.
    Gillies, M.
    Pearse, R. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (01) : 146 - 155
  • [2] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist on postoperative complications
    Bergs, J.
    Hellings, J.
    Cleemput, I.
    Zurel, O.
    De Troyer, V.
    Van Hiel, M.
    Demeere, J. -L.
    Claeys, D.
    Vandijck, D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (03) : 150 - 158
  • [3] Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
    Biffl W.L.
    Gallagher A.W.
    Pieracci F.M.
    Berumen C.
    [J]. Patient Safety in Surgery, 9 (1)
  • [4] A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness, Compliance, and Critical Factors for Implementation of Safety Checklists in Surgery
    Borchard, Annegret
    Schwappach, David L. B.
    Barbir, Aline
    Bezzola, Paula
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (06) : 925 - 933
  • [5] Is the Surgical Safety Checklist successfully conducted? An observational study of social interactions in the operating rooms of a tertiary hospital
    Cullati, Stephane
    Le Du, Sophie
    Rae, Anne-Claire
    Micallef, Martine
    Khabiri, Ebrahim
    Ourahmoune, Aimad
    Boireaux, Armelle
    Licker, Marc
    Chopard, Pierre
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (08) : 639 - 646
  • [6] Variation in global uptake of the Surgical Safety Checklist
    Delisle, M.
    Pradarelli, J. C.
    Panda, N.
    Koritsanszky, L.
    Sonnay, Y.
    Lipsitz, S.
    Pearse, R.
    Harrison, E. M.
    Biccard, B.
    Weiser, T. G.
    Haynes, A. B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (02) : E151 - E160
  • [7] Ellis PD, 2010, ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO EFFECT SIZES: STATISTICAL POWER, META-ANALYSIS AND THE INTERPRETATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS, P31
  • [8] How Much and What Local Adaptation Is Acceptable? A Comparison of 24 Surgical Safety Checklists in Switzerland
    Fridrich, Annemarie
    Imhof, Anita
    Schwappach, David L. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 17 (03) : 217 - 222
  • [9] Use of surgical safety checklists in Australian operating theatres: an observational study
    Giles, Kristy
    Munn, Zachary
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    Deakin, Anita
    Schultz, Timothy
    Mandel, Catherine
    Maddern, Guy
    Pearson, Alan
    Runciman, William
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (12) : 971 - 975
  • [10] A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population.
    Haynes, Alex B.
    Weiser, Thomas G.
    Berry, William R.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Breizat, Abdel-Hadi S.
    Dellinger, E. Patchen
    Herbosa, Teodoro
    Joseph, Sudhir
    Kibatala, Pascience L.
    Lapitan, Marie Carmela M.
    Merry, Alan F.
    Moorthy, Krishna
    Reznick, Richard K.
    Taylor, Bryce
    Gawande, Atul A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (05) : 491 - 499