Requalifying public buildings and utilities using a group decision support system

被引:18
作者
Lolli, Francesco [1 ]
Ishizaka, Alessio [2 ]
Gamberini, Rita [1 ]
Rimini, Bianca [1 ]
Balugani, Elia [1 ]
Prandini, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Sci & Methods Engn, Via Amendola 2, I-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business Sch, Ctr Operat Res & Logist, Portsmouth, Hants, England
关键词
Energy requalification; Decision support system; AHP; Clustering; Knapsack; ROUGH SET APPROACH; SORTING PROBLEMS; INFORMATION; CLASSIFICATION; FLOWSORT; RANKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public buildings and utilities are responsible for a significant share of energy consumption and other related CO2 emissions. There is therefore an acute need for energy requalification interventions. Unfortunately, municipalities are under tight budget constraints but decisions have to be made. A new hybrid group decision support system has been proposed in a bid to provide them with firm, transparent support. The system is based on a combination of the analytic hierarchy process, the K means algorithm, and the 0-1 knapsack model. The first two methods aim at sorting alternatives into ordered classes of importance. To help in this task, the Bezier curve-fitting approach is used to construct the preference functions of decision-makers based on reference points. Then, the knapsack model selects the alternatives from the generated classes while complying with the budget constraints. A case study carried out in an Italian municipality allowed us to verify the validity of our new method in a real setting, and to highlight the advantages of an automatic sorting procedure in practice. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1092
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CHANGE
[2]   Visual and Interactive Comparative Analysis of Individual Opinions: A Group Decision Support Tool [J].
Bezerra, Francineide de Morais ;
Melo, Paulo ;
Costa, Joao Paulo .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2014, 23 (01) :101-125
[3]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656
[4]   An interactive sorting approach based on the assignment examples of multiple decision makers with different priorities [J].
Cai, Fu-Ling ;
Liao, Xiuwu ;
Wang, Kan-Liang .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 197 (01) :87-108
[5]   Dominance-based rough set approach for group decisions [J].
Chakhar, Salem ;
Ishizaka, Alessio ;
Labib, Ashraf ;
Saad, Ines .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 251 (01) :206-224
[6]   Dominance-based rough set approach for groups in multicriteria classification problems [J].
Chakhar, Salem ;
Saad, Ines .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2012, 54 (01) :372-380
[7]   A Decision Rule Aggregation Approach to Multiple Criteria-Multiple Participant Sorting [J].
Chen, Y. ;
Kilgour, D. Marc ;
Hipel, Keith W. .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2012, 21 (05) :727-745
[8]   Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS [J].
Damart, Sebastien ;
Dias, Luis C. ;
Mousseau, Vincent .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2007, 43 (04) :1464-1475
[9]   UPPER AND LOWER PROBABILITIES GENERATED BY A RANDOM CLOSED INTERVAL [J].
DEMPSTER, AP .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1968, 39 (03) :957-&
[10]   ELECTRE TRI for groups with imprecise information on parameter values [J].
Dias, L ;
Clímaco, J .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2000, 9 (05) :355-377