Evaluation of alveolar nerve function after surgical lengthening of the mandible by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis

被引:15
作者
Baas, E. M. [1 ]
de Lange, J. [1 ,2 ]
Horsthuis, R. B. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Isala Klin, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Ctr Dent ACTA, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
mandibular advancement; distraction osteogenesis; sagittal split osteotomy; mandibular retrognathia; inferior alveolar nerve; NEUROSENSORY DISTURBANCE; ADVANCEMENT SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; STABILITY; FIXATION; RELAPSE; INJURY; ANGLE; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study compares the effects of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and distraction osteogenesis (DO) for lengthening the mandible regarding loss of function of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) In a retrospective cohort study design, the function of the IAN was tested with a Weinstein monofilament 3 22, 1 year after the surgical procedure in 65 patients (35 BSSO; 30 DO). This was defined as the upper limit for normal function Of 130 IAN studied (70 BSSO, 54%, 60 DO, 46%), nerve function was disturbed in 23 (18%). In this group, 14 cases (61%) had undergone BSSO and 9 (39%) DO One-hundred and seven nerves had no neurosensory IAN changes; of these BSSO had been performed in 56 cases (52%) and DO in 51 cases (48%) After eliminating confounding factors, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of neurosensory changes between the treatment options (DO versus BSSO, odds ratio 1.254 with 95% Cl 0.366-4.300). In conclusion, there was no difference in IAN function between patients treated with BSSO or DO for lengthening the mandible
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 533
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   On neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split osteotomy [J].
Al-Bishri, A ;
Rosenquist, J ;
Sunzel, B .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 62 (12) :1472-1476
[2]   SKELETAL STABILITY AFTER MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT - A COMPARISON OF 2 RIGID INTERNAL-FIXATION TECHNIQUES [J].
BLOMQVIST, JE ;
ISAKSSON, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (11) :1133-1137
[3]   Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions [J].
Breuning, KH ;
van Strijen, PJ ;
Prahl-Andersen, B ;
Tuinzing, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 127 (01) :25-29
[4]  
Chen N, 1999, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V14, P259
[5]   Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A historic perspective and future directions [J].
Cope, JB ;
Samchukov, ML ;
Cherkashin, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (04) :448-460
[6]  
DAL PONT G, 1961, J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv, V19, P42
[7]   Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery [J].
Eggensperger, A ;
Smolka, K ;
Luder, J ;
Iizuka, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 35 (01) :36-42
[8]   CAUSES, LOCATION, AND TIMING OF RELAPSE FOLLOWING RIGID FIXATION AFTER MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT [J].
GASSMANN, CJ ;
VANSICKELS, JE ;
THRASH, WJ .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1990, 48 (05) :450-454
[9]  
HUNSUCK EE, 1968, J ORAL SURG, V26, P249
[10]  
ILIZAROV GA, 1988, B HOSP JOINT DIS ORT, V48, P1