STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SAPS II-III, APACHE II-IV AND MPM II SCORES IN THE DETERMINATION OF PROGNOSIS OF THE PATIENTS IN REANIMATION INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

被引:0
作者
Ilker, Ince [1 ]
Mehmet, Kizilkaya [1 ]
Mehmet, Aksoy [1 ]
Aysenur, Dostbil [1 ]
Fesih, Kara [2 ]
Aysenur, Sumercoskun [3 ]
Ali, Ahiskalioglu [1 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanim, TR-2500 Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Erzurum Sifa Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanim, Erzurum, Turkey
[3] Denizli Cal Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanim, Denizli, Turkey
来源
ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA | 2015年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词
SAPS II; SAPS III; APACHE II; APACHE IV; MPM II; ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY SCORE; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; SYSTEMS; COHORT; ICU;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) and Mortality Probability Models (MPM) are the most commonly used mortality prediction scores. In this study, we aimed to research effectiveness of SAPS APACHE II-IV and MPM II in the evaluation of prognosis in the patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit. Materials and methods: The files of the patients hospitalized in the Reanimation Intensive Care Unit between January 2008 and June 2010 were examined retrospectively. 466 patients who stayed at least 24 hours in the intensive care unit were enrolled in the study. Results: The mortality rate was determined as 53.93%. The estimated mortality rate was determined as 60.62% for APACHE II, 48.96% for APACHE IV, 57.52% for SAPS II, 58.94% for SAPS III and 46.89% for MPM II. ROC curve analysis results were 0.734 for APACHE II, 0.740 for APACHE IV, 0.717 for SAPS II, 0.720 for SAPS III and 0.700 for MPM II. Conclusion: In our study, the mortality prediction results of SAPS II-III, APACHE II-IV and MPM II scores were found to be statistically signcant between the deceased and living patients. When these scoring systems were compared in ROC curve analysis for the mortality prediction rank, it was found that APACHE IV was the best mortality predictive score system and the others were APACHE II, SAPS III, SAPS II, MPM II, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 131
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   The performance of customised APACHE II and SAPS II in predicting mortality of mixed critically ill patients in a Thai medical intensive care unit [J].
Khwannimit, B. ;
Bhurayanontachai, R. .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2009, 37 (05) :784-790
[12]  
KILIC Yusuf Alper, 2002, YOGUN BAKIM DERGISI, V2, P26
[13]   APACHE-II - A SEVERITY OF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
DRAPER, EA ;
WAGNER, DP ;
ZIMMERMAN, JE .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1985, 13 (10) :818-829
[14]  
LEGALL JR, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V271, P1321
[15]   A NEW SIMPLIFIED ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY SCORE (SAPS-II) BASED ON A EUROPEAN NORTH-AMERICAN MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
LEGALL, JR ;
LEMESHOW, S ;
SAULNIER, F .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (24) :2957-2963
[16]  
LEGALL JR, 1984, CRIT CARE MED, V12, P975
[17]   MORTALITY PROBABILITY-MODELS (MPM-II) BASED ON AN INTERNATIONAL COHORT OF INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT PATIENTS [J].
LEMESHOW, S ;
TERES, D ;
KLAR, J ;
AVRUNIN, JS ;
GEHLBACH, SH ;
RAPOPORT, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (20) :2478-2486
[18]  
Margeret SH, CLIN CHEST MED, V24, P751
[19]   SAPS 3 - From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description [J].
Metnitz, PGH ;
Moreno, RP ;
Almeida, E ;
Jordan, B ;
Bauer, P ;
Campos, RA ;
Iapichino, G ;
Edbrooke, D ;
Capuzzo, M ;
Le Gall, JR .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (10) :1336-1344
[20]   Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in Predicting Hospital Mortality of Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit Patients [J].
Park, Sang-Kyu ;
Chun, Hyoung-Joon ;
Kim, Dong-Won ;
Im, Tai-Ho ;
Hong, Hyun-Jong ;
Yi, Hyeong-Joong .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 24 (03) :420-426