Evaluation Criteria for Public Procurement

被引：0

作者：

Ochrana, Frantisek ^{[1
]}

Placek, Michel ^{[2
]}

Abonyiova, Veronika ^{[1
]}

Pucek, Milan Jan ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Smetanovo Nabrezi 6, Prague 11001 1, Czech Republic

[2] Private Coll Econ Studies Znojmo, Znojmo 66902, Czech Republic

来源：

EUROPEAN FINANCIAL SYSTEMS 2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE | 2015年

关键词：

public procurement; public contracts for construction; evaluation criteria; the lowest price; the economic advantages of offers;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F8 [财政、金融];

学科分类号：

0202 ;

摘要：

The paper analyzes evaluation criteria in public procurements. It examines a data set of public procurements for construction that were awarded in Czech Republic in 2013. Evaluation criteria for public contracts was applied to a set of 5065 public contracts. Two methods of evaluating bids can be used for the evaluation of public contracts: single-criterion (the lowest bid price) and Multi-criterion (economically advantageous tender). The paper analyzes the use criterion of the lowest tender price and criteria economically advantageous tender with regard to the frequency of their use, their average weight, the price differential (final price of tenders) and the type of procurement procedure used. The predominant evaluation criterion is the lowest price and respective bid price. The criteria of the quality and functionality of public contracts was found to be infrequently used.

引用

页码：428 / 435

页数：8

共 18 条

[1]

[Anonymous], TRANSYLVANIAN REV AD

[2]

[Anonymous], ACTA U AGR SILVICULT

[3]

[Anonymous], VEREJNE ZAKAZKY CR C

[4]

[Anonymous], OTEVRENOST ZADAVACIC

[5]

Bandiera O., 2008, RES PAPER SERIES, V6

[6]

Bolton P., 2005, Contract theory

[7]

Domberger Simon., 1994, International Journal of the Economics of Business, V1, P439

[8] Auction reforms for effective official development assistance [J].

Iimi, A .

REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2006, 28 (02) :109-128

[9]

JurcIK Radek, 2014, WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, V11, P615

[10]

Jurcík R, 2012, EKON CAS, V60, P766

← 1 2 →