Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in cancer patients

被引:0
作者
Baker, J
McCune, JS
Harvey, RD
Bonsignore, C
Lindley, CM
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] USN, Naval Med Ctr, Med Serv Corp, Portsmouth, VA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Pharm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina Hosp, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; drug utilization evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a retrospective drug utilization evaluation comparing the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a university medical center with the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) CSFs Practice Guidelines. METHODS: patients who received G-CSF from June 1, 1996, to December 31, 1996, were identified through the pharmacy computer system and the medical records were reviewed for a randomly selected sample of 26% of the 289 patients identified. Outpatient, inpatient, and electronic medical records were reviewed for the indication, dosage, day of initiation, day of discontinuation, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) monitoring plan for each course of G-CSF; these records wee subsequently compared with the ASCO guidelines. RESULTS: The use of G-CSF after chemotherapy was evaluate in 51 patients who received a total of 182 courses of G-CSF. The goal of chemotherapy was curative in 61% of courses. Sixty-five percent of G-CSF courses were prescribed for primary prophylaxis. Of these, 74% followed chemotherapy in patients wit an expected incidence of febrile neutropenia greater than or equal to 40% or followed chemotherapy in patients wit compromised marrow reserve secondary to extensive prior therapy or in patients older than 60 years. Most of the G-CSF courses (75%) were rounded to the nearest vial size. The areas of greatest departure from the ASCO guidelines included aspects of initiation and discontinuation of G-CSF courses and inadequate documentation of ANC recovery. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a number of specific opportunities for oncology pharmacists to improve the use of G-CSF in patients receiving chemotherapy. Recommendations were made to the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and medical oncologists to improve compliance wit the ASCO guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 857
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Randomized comparison between antibiotics alone and antibiotics plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Escherichia coli-derived) in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia [J].
Anaissie, EJ ;
Vartivarian, S ;
Bodey, GP ;
Legrand, C ;
Kantarjian, H ;
AbiSaid, D ;
Karl, C ;
VadhanRaj, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 100 (01) :17-23
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, J CLIN ONCOL, V14, P1957
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, J CLIN ONCOL, V12, P2471
[4]   Filgrastim and lack of support of intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer patients [J].
Baldini, E ;
Tibaldi, C ;
Lencioni, M ;
Giannessi, P ;
Evangelista, G ;
Roncella, M ;
Spinelli, C ;
Meucci, C ;
daPrato, M ;
Conte, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1997, 20 (02) :169-172
[5]  
Bennett RJ, 1996, ENVIRON PLANN C, V14, P1
[6]   Routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is not cost-effective and does not increase patient comfort in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: An analysis using a Markov model [J].
Chouaid, C ;
Bassinet, L ;
Fuhrman, C ;
Monnet, I ;
Housset, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (08) :2700-2707
[7]  
CRAWFORD J, 1992, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V11, P299
[9]   ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF PROPHYLACTIC G-CSF AFTER MINI-BEAM SALVAGE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR HODGKINS AND NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA [J].
DRANITSARIS, G ;
SUTCLIFFE, SB .
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 1995, 17 (1-2) :139-145
[10]  
EGUCHI K, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P5221