One-equation turbulence models applied to practical scramjet inlet

被引:0
作者
Pasha, Amjad A. [1 ]
Juhany, Khalid A. [1 ]
Pillai, Subramania N. [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Aerosp Engn Dept, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] SASTRA Deemed Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Turbulence & Flow Control Lab, Thanjavur 613401, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
CFD; high-speed flows; scramjet; separation bubble; shock wave; turbulence models; SHOCK-UNSTEADINESS; LAYER INTERACTIONS; MACH NUMBER; PREDICTION; SIMULATION; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1515/tjj-2021-0013
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations are used to simulate a practical scramjet inlet geometry using the shock-unsteadiness modified Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model. The geometry consists of fore-body ramps, expansion corners, and inlet ducts. The focus is to study the impingement of the cowl shock on the opposite wall boundary-layer. The resulting separation bubble can lead to blockage and inlet unstarts. The shock-unsteadiness correction is employed and is found to improve the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) prediction of flow separation in shock/boundary-layer interactions. The shock-unsteadiness parameter is calibrated against available experimental data of canonical flows, and the predicted flow-field is analyzed in detail. A large separation bubble size normalized to the upstream boundary-layer thickness of 4.6 is observed in the interaction region. Across the reattachment region in the interaction region, a peak value of wall pressure is observed. The inlet performance parameters are also calculated. The total pressure losses of 62% are observed across different shock waves, with an additional loss of 15% due to viscous boundary-layer effects.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 249
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Anderson J.D., 2002, Modern Compressible Flow: with Historical Perspective, V3
[2]  
Arnal D., 2004, LAMINAR TURBULENT TR, P1
[3]   Uncertainty Assessment of Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics Prediction Capability [J].
Bose, Deepak ;
Brown, James L. ;
Prabhu, Dinesh K. ;
Gnoffo, Peter ;
Johnston, Christopher O. ;
Hollis, Brian .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2013, 50 (01) :12-18
[4]  
Curran ET., 2000, AIAA J, V189, P539
[5]  
Edney B., 1968, 115 FFA AER RES I SW
[6]   Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions [J].
Gaitonde, Datta V. .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2015, 72 :80-99
[7]   Thrust control strategy based on the minimum combustor inlet Mach number to enhance the overall performance of a scramjet engine [J].
Ji, Zifei ;
Zhang, Huiqiang ;
Wang, Bing .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2019, 233 (13) :4810-4824
[8]   Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions [J].
Knight, D ;
Yan, H ;
Panaras, AG ;
Zheltovodov, A .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2003, 39 (2-3) :121-184
[9]   THE SOLUTION OF THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS USING GAUSS-SEIDEL LINE RELAXATION [J].
MACCORMACK, RW ;
CANDLER, GV .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 1989, 17 (01) :135-150
[10]  
Marvin J.G., 2013, Tech. Rep., NASA TM- 2013-216604