The local projection in the density functional theory plus U approach: A critical assessment

被引:32
|
作者
Wang, Yue-Chao [1 ]
Chen, Ze-Hua [1 ]
Jiang, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Chem & Mol Engn, State Key Lab Rare Earth Mat Chem & Applicat, Beijing Natl Lab Mol Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS | 2016年 / 144卷 / 14期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
STRONGLY CORRELATED SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE; LDA+U METHOD; BAND THEORY; SPECTRA; IMPLEMENTATION; TRANSITION; STATES;
D O I
10.1063/1.4945608
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Density-functional theory plus the Hubbard U correction (DFT+U) method is widely used in first-principles studies of strongly correlated systems, as it can give qualitatively (and sometimes, semi-quantitatively) correct description of energetic and structural properties of many strongly correlated systems with similar computational cost as local density approximation or generalized gradient approximation. On the other hand, the DFT+U approach is limited both theoretically and practically in several important aspects. In particular, the results of DFT+U often depend on the choice of local orbitals (the local projection) defining the subspace in which the Hubbard U correction is applied. In this work we have systematically investigated the issue of the local projection by considering typical transition metal oxides, beta-MnO2 and MnO, and comparing the results obtained from different implementations of DFT+U. We found that the choice of the local projection has significant effects on the DFT+U results, which are more significant for systems with stronger covalent bonding (e.g., MnO2) than those with more ionic bonding (e.g., MnO). These findings can help to clarify some confusion arising from the practical use of DFT+U and may also provide insights for the development of new first-principles approaches beyond DFT+U. Published by AIP Publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intra- and Interatomic Spin Interactions by the Density Functional Theory plus U Approach: A Critical Assessment
    Zhang, Yachao
    Jiang, Hong
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2011, 7 (09) : 2795 - 2803
  • [2] Predicting critical temperatures of iron(II) spin crossover materials: Density functional theory plus U approach
    Zhang, Yachao
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 141 (21):
  • [3] Critical Assessment of the DFT plus U Approach for the Prediction of Vanadium Dioxide Properties
    Stahl, Berenike
    Bredow, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 41 (03) : 258 - 265
  • [4] Self-consistent DFT plus U method for real-space time-dependent density functional theory calculations
    Tancogne-Dejean, Nicolas
    Oliveira, Micael J. T.
    Rubio, Angel
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2017, 96 (24)
  • [5] Vibrational properties of MnO and NiO from DFT plus U-based density functional perturbation theory
    Floris, A.
    de Gironcoli, S.
    Gross, E. K. U.
    Cococcioni, M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2011, 84 (16):
  • [6] Density Functional Theory plus Hubbard U Study of the Segregation of Pt to the CeO2-x Grain Boundary
    Zhou, Guoli
    Li, Pan
    Ma, Qngmin
    Tian, Zhixue
    Liu, Ying
    NANO LETTERS, 2018, 18 (03) : 1668 - 1677
  • [7] Ab initio density functional theory plus U predictions of the shear response of iron oxides
    Liao, Peilin
    Carter, Emily A.
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2010, 58 (18) : 5912 - 5925
  • [8] Constrained density functional theory plus the Hubbard U correction approach for the electronic polaron mobility: A case study of TiO2
    Wang, Yue-Chao
    Jiang, Hong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 34 (05) : 541 - 551
  • [9] Local Potential Functional Embedding Theory: A Self-Consistent Flavor of Density Functional Theory for Lattices without Density Functionals
    Sekaran, Sajanthan
    Saubanere, Matthieu
    Fromager, Emmanuel
    COMPUTATION, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [10] TDDFT plus U: A critical assessment of the Hubbard U correction to exchange-correlation kernels and potentials
    Orhan, Okan K.
    O'Regan, David D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2019, 99 (16)