Hydroxyapatite/Collagen Composite Is a Reliable Material for Malar Augmentation

被引:18
作者
D'Agostino, Antonio [1 ]
Trevisiol, Lorenzo [1 ]
Favero, Vittorio [1 ]
Gunson, Michael J. [2 ]
Pedica, Federica [3 ]
Nocini, Pier Francesco [1 ]
Arnett, G. William [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Surg, Unit Maxillofacial Surg & Dent, Ple LA Scuro 10, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Arnett & Gunson Facial Reconstruct, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Pathol & Diagnost, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[4] Loma Linda Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Loma Linda, CA 92350 USA
关键词
BONE-GRAFT SUBSTITUTE; EXPANDED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; POLYETHYLENE IMPLANTS; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; AESTHETIC SURGERY; TISSUE-RESPONSE; CATHEPSIN-K; GORE-TEX; HYDROXYLAPATITE; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.052
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term results of cheekbone augmentation using porous hydroxyapatite granules mixed with microfibrillar collagen in a large group of patients. Materials and Methods: Four hundred thirty patients who underwent zygomatic augmentation and intermaxillary osteotomy were evaluated clinically, radiologically, and histologically. Results: Complications were found in 13 patients (1.56%). There were no relevant radiologic differences in prosthesis volume after 1 month (T1) or after 24 months (T2) in any patient; there were no clinically relevant differences in 110 patients after 36 months. At T1, the prosthesis had a granular structure and the granules had not migrated; at T2, the prosthesis was staunchly adhering to the underlying bone. Over time, the radiopacity of the material increased. Histologic results of 19 biopsy specimens obtained from 8 patients 2 years after the procedure showed prominent ossification with low inflammation, confirming new bone formation over time. According to the visual analog scale, the patients were generally satisfied with the aspects that were considered. Conclusion: Hydroxyapatite and collagen composite used during malarplasty produced a successful outcome. Its main drawback is a learning curve that is longer than for more frequently used implantable biomaterials. (C) 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1238.e1 / 1238.e15
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   SOFT-TISSUE RESPONSE TO PROPLAST - QUANTITATION OF SCAR INGROWTH [J].
AREM, AJ ;
RASMUSSEN, D ;
MADDEN, JW .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1978, 61 (02) :214-219
[2]   Aesthetic Surgery of the Face and Neck [J].
Barton, Fritz E., Jr. .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2009, 29 (06) :449-463
[3]   Avoiding and Treating Blindness From Fillers: A Review of the World Literature [J].
Beleznay, Katie ;
Carruthers, Jean D. A. ;
Humphrey, Shannon ;
Jones, Derek .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2015, 41 (10) :1097-1117
[4]  
BELL W H, 1988, International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, V3, P23
[5]  
Bertossi D, 2000, Ann Chir Plast Esthet, V45, P548
[6]  
Bertossi Dario, 2003, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V5, P392, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.5.5.392
[7]   ON THE FEASIBILITY OF INTRAORAL MAXILLO-MALAR OSTEOTOMY [J].
BRUSATI, R ;
SESENNA, E ;
RAFFAINI, M .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1989, 17 (03) :110-115
[8]  
Bucky Louis P, 2008, Aesthet Surg J, V28, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.asj.2008.02.004
[9]  
Campioni K., 2010, J BIOMATER NANOBIOTE, V1, P1
[10]  
Carboni A., 2002, Eur J Plat Surg, V25, P310, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00238-002-0407-3