Outpatient Prostatectomy: Too Much Too Soon or Just What the Patient Ordered

被引:50
作者
Martin, Aaron D. [1 ]
Nunez, Rafael N. [1 ]
Andrews, Jack R. [1 ]
Martin, George L. [1 ]
Andrews, Paul E. [1 ]
Castle, Erik P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SATISFACTION; PERINEAL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of performing a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) as an outpatient procedure while maintaining patient satisfaction and safety. Herein we report our experience, selection criteria, and discharge criteria for outpatient RARP. METHODS We performed a prospective study with 11 patients undergoing extraperitoneal RARP. These patients were counseled before the procedure that they would go home the same evening of the procedure. The patients were then surveyed by a third party shortly after they returned home, using the Patient Judgement System-24, a previously validated instrument for patient satisfaction. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected for analysis. RESULTS All patients were successfully discharged the same day of surgery. Mean patient age was 62.2 years with a mean body mass index of 26 kg/m(2). Mean operative time was 117.6 minutes, console time was 76.7 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 168.2 mL. Mean indwelling catheter time was 7.5 days. No complications occurred in this series of patients. Satisfaction was unanimously high in all patients surveyed, with most scores over 90% on the Patient Judgement System-24. No patient reported any ill effects from the shortened stay or felt rushed to leave the hospital. CONCLUSIONS The early experience with extraperitoneal RARP as a same day surgery is promising. Preoperative patient counseling and selection is paramount. Patient satisfaction is not adversely affected by the shortened stay. Surgeon experience, assessment of intraoperative findings, and adequate postoperative assessment are essential. UROLOGY 75: 421-426, 2010. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 424
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy [J].
Burgess, Scott V. ;
Atug, Fatih ;
Castle, Erik P. ;
Davis, Rodney ;
Thomas, Raju .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (10) :827-830
[2]   EFFECT OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER ON PATIENT QUALITY-OF-LIFE - RESULTS FROM A MEDICARE SURVEY [J].
FOWLER, FJ ;
BARRY, MJ ;
LUYAO, G ;
WASSON, J ;
ROMAN, A ;
WENNBERG, J .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (06) :1007-1013
[3]   HOSPITAL QUALITY TRENDS - A SHORT-FORM PATIENT-BASED MEASURE [J].
HAYS, RD ;
LARSON, C ;
NELSON, EC ;
BATALDEN, PB .
MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (07) :661-668
[4]   Maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction with radical prostatectomy in the era of cost containment [J].
Klein, EA ;
Grass, JA ;
Calabrese, DA ;
Kay, RA ;
Sargeant, W ;
OHara, JF .
UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (02) :269-276
[5]   Patient satisfaction with short stays for radical prostatectomy [J].
Litwin, MS ;
Shpall, AI ;
Dorey, F .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (06) :898-905
[6]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE OUTCOMES IN MEN FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
LITWIN, MS ;
HAYS, RD ;
FINK, A ;
GANZ, PA ;
LEAKE, B ;
LEACH, GE ;
BROOK, RH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (02) :129-135
[7]   The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques [J].
Lotan, Y ;
Cadeddu, JA ;
Gettman, MT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (04) :1431-1435
[8]   Outpatient radical prostatectomy: Impact of standard perineal approach on patient outcome [J].
Ruiz-Deya, G ;
Davis, R ;
Srivastav, SK ;
Wise, AM ;
Thomas, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) :581-586