Coronal Magnetic Structure of Earthbound CMEs and In Situ Comparison

被引:57
|
作者
Palmerio, E. [1 ]
Kilpua, E. K. J. [1 ]
Moestl, C. [2 ]
Bothmer, V. [3 ]
James, A. W. [4 ]
Green, L. M. [4 ]
Isavnin, A. [5 ]
Davies, J. A. [6 ]
Harrison, R. A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Phys, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Austrian Acad Sci, Space Res Inst, Graz, Austria
[3] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Inst Astrophys, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Coll London, Mullard Space Sci Lab, Dorking, Surrey, England
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Math Plasma Astrophys, Dept Math, Leuven, Belgium
[6] Harwell Campus, Rutherford Appleton Lab, STFC RAL Space, Harwell, Didcot, England
来源
SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS | 2018年 / 16卷 / 05期
基金
奥地利科学基金会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
coronal mass ejections; corona; solar wind; magnetic field; flux ropes; INTERPLANETARY FLUX ROPES; MASS EJECTIONS; MAGNETOSPHERIC STORMS; FIELD CONFIGURATIONS; CLOUDS; RECONSTRUCTION; HELICITY; PROPAGATION; MISSION; REGION;
D O I
10.1002/2017SW001767
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Predicting the magnetic field within an Earth-directed coronal mass ejection (CME) well before its arrival at Earth is one of the most important issues in space weather research. In this article, we compare the intrinsic flux rope type, that is, the CME orientation and handedness during eruption, with the in situ flux rope type for 20 CME events that have been uniquely linked from Sun to Earth through heliospheric imaging. Our study shows that the intrinsic flux rope type can be estimated for CMEs originating from different source regions using a combination of indirect proxies. We find that only 20% of the events studied match strictly between the intrinsic and in situ flux rope types. The percentage rises to 55% when intermediate cases (where the orientation at the Sun and/or in situ is close to 45 degrees) are considered as a match. We also determine the change in the flux rope tilt angle between the Sun and Earth. For the majority of the cases, the rotation is several tens of degrees, while 35% of the events change by more than 90 degrees. While occasionally the intrinsic flux rope type is a good proxy for the magnetic structure impacting Earth, our study highlights the importance of capturing the CME evolution for space weather forecasting purposes. Moreover, we emphasize that determination of the intrinsic flux rope type is a crucial input for CME forecasting models. Plain Language Summary Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are huge eruptions from the Sun that can cause myriad of space weather effects at Earth. The ability of a CME to drive a geomagnetic storm is given largely by how its magnetic field is configured. Predicting the magnetic structure well before CME arrival at Earth is one of the major goals in space weather forecasting. Palmerio et al. (2018) study 20 CMEs observed both at the Sun and at Earth. They use observations of the solar disc to determine the magnetic structure at the Sun and then compare it with the magnetic structure estimated via magnetic field measurements near Earth. They report that the magnetic structures match closely only in 20% of the events studied. They also estimate the orientations of the CME axes at the Sun and at Earth. They find that 65% of the events change their orientations by less than 90 degrees. They conclude that knowledge of the CME magnetic structure at the Sun is an important factor in space weather forecasting, but the CME evolution after eruption has to be taken into account in order to improve current predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 460
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of a formalism for computing in situ transits of Earth-directed CMEs - Part 2: Towards a forecasting tool
    Corona-Romero, Pedro
    Riley, Pete
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2020, 38 (03) : 657 - 681
  • [42] Coronal Magnetic Field Models
    Wiegelmann, Thomas
    Petrie, Gordon J. D.
    Riley, Pete
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2017, 210 (1-4) : 249 - 274
  • [43] Coronal Magnetic Field Models
    Thomas Wiegelmann
    Gordon J. D. Petrie
    Pete Riley
    Space Science Reviews, 2017, 210 : 249 - 274
  • [44] Initiation of CMEs:: the role of magnetic twist
    van Driel-Gesztelyi, L
    Manoharan, PK
    Démoulin, P
    Aulanier, G
    Mandrini, CH
    Lopez-Fuentes, M
    Schmieder, B
    Orlando, S
    Thompson, B
    Plunkett, S
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2000, 62 (16) : 1437 - 1448
  • [45] Magnetohydrodynamics modeling of coronal magnetic field and solar eruptions based on the photospheric magnetic field
    Inoue, Satoshi
    PROGRESS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE, 2016, 3
  • [46] The pancaking of coronal mass ejections: an in situ attestation
    Raghav, Anil N.
    Shaikh, Zubair, I
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 493 (01) : L16 - L21
  • [47] A Numerical Study of the Response of the Coronal Magnetic Field to Flux Emergence
    Jacobs, C.
    Poedts, S.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2012, 280 (02) : 389 - 405
  • [48] 3-D MHD simulations of CMEs by coupled coronal and heliospheric models
    Odstrcil, D
    Linker, JA
    Lionello, R
    Mikic, Z
    Riley, P
    Pizzo, VJ
    Luhmann, JG
    SOLAR VARIABILITY: FROM CORE TO OUTER FRONTIERS, VOLS 1 & 2, 2002, 506 : 95 - 98
  • [49] A coronal mass ejection encountered by four spacecraft within 1 au from the Sun: ensemble modelling of propagation and magnetic structure
    Palmerio, Erika
    Kay, Christina
    Al-Haddad, Nada
    Lynch, Benjamin J.
    Trotta, Domenico
    Yu, Wenyuan
    Ledvina, Vincent E.
    Sanchez-Cano, Beatriz
    Riley, Pete
    Heyner, Daniel
    Schmid, Daniel
    Fischer, David
    Richter, Ingo
    Auster, Hans-Ulrich
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 536 (01) : 203 - 222
  • [50] The Deflection of Coronal Mass Ejections by the Ambient Coronal Magnetic Field Configuration
    Wang, Jingjing
    Hoeksema, J. Todd
    Liu, Siqing
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2020, 125 (08)