Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section

被引:15
|
作者
Zhou, Xingchen [1 ]
Zhang, Tao [2 ]
Qiao, Huayuan [3 ]
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Xipeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Xinhua Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1665 Kong Jiang Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Municipal Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Dept Ultrasound, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Cesarean section; Cesarean scar defect (CSD); Thickness of residual myometrial (TRM); Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS); Predictive model; SEGMENT THICKNESS; VAGINAL REPAIR; RISK-FACTORS; INCISION; PREVALENCE; SONOGRAPHY; NICHE; HYSTEROSCOPY; PREDICTION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-021-01337-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Caesarean scar defect (CSD) seriously affects female reproductive health. In this study, we aim to evaluate uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) in nonpregnant women with cesarean section (CS) history and to build a predictive model for cesarean scar defects is very necessary. Methods A total of 607 nonpregnant women with previous CS who have transvaginal ultrasound measurements of the thickness of the lower uterine segment. The related clinical data were recorded and analyzed. Results All patients were divided into two groups according to their clinical symptoms: Group A (N = 405) who had no cesarean scar symptoms, and Group B (N = 141) who had cesarean scar symptoms. The difference in frequency of CS, uterine position, detection rate of CSD and the residual muscular layer (TRM) of the CSD were statistically significant between groups; the TRM measurements of the two groups were (mm) 5.39 +/- 3.34 versus 3.22 +/- 2.33, P < 0.05. All patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had CSDs: Group C (N = 337) who had no CSDs, Group D (N = 209) who had CSDs on ultrasound examination. The differences in frequency of CS, uterine position, TRM between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the model predicting CSDs by TRM with TVS, the area under the ROC curve was 0.771, the cut-off value was 4.15 mm. The sensitivity and specificity were 87.8% and 71.3%, respectively. Conclusions Patients with no clinical symptoms had a mean TRM on transvaginal ultrasonography of 5.39 +/- 3.34 mm, which could be used as a good reference to predict the recovery of patients with CSDs after repair surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Cesarean section scar using saline contrast sonohysterography in women with previous Cesarean scar pregnancy
    Pekar-Zlotin, M.
    Maymon, R.
    Nimrodi, M.
    Zur-Naaman, H.
    Melcer, Y.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 63 (04) : 551 - 555
  • [22] Systematic Review of Cesarean Scar Assessment in the Nonpregnant State: Imaging Techniques and Uterine Scar Defect
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Boutin, Amelie
    Chaillet, Nils
    Moore, Lynne
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2012, 29 (06) : 465 - 471
  • [23] A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
    Allameh, Zahra
    Rouholamin, Safoura
    Rasti, Sina
    Adibi, Atoosa
    Foroughi, Zahra
    Goharian, Maryam
    Rad, Mehrdad Rabiee
    Dabaghi, Ghazal Ghasempour
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [24] Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement
    Osser, O. Vikhareva
    Jokubkiene, L.
    Valentin, L.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 35 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [25] Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of uterine scar after previous caesarean section: comparison with 3T-magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging
    Fiocchi, Federica
    Petrella, Elisabetta
    Nocetti, Luca
    Curra, Serena
    Ligabue, Guido
    Costi, Tiziana
    Torricelli, Pietro
    Facchinetti, Fabio
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (02): : 228 - 238
  • [26] Transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to assess the thickness of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean section
    Afifi, Ahmed Nagy
    Taymour, Mohammad Ahmed
    El-Khayat, Waleed Mamdouh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 271 : 145 - 151
  • [27] OBSERVATION OF CESAREAN-SECTION SCAR BY TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    CHEN, HY
    CHEN, SJ
    HSIEH, FJ
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 16 (05) : 443 - 447
  • [28] Uterine Scar Evaluation during the Postpartum: Pleading for Extradecidual Suturing during Cesarean Section
    Kesrouani, Assaad K.
    Abdelkhalek, Yara
    Abdallah, Wael
    Chaccour, Christian
    Hatoum, Inaam
    Richa, Freda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e1357 - e1361
  • [29] Can third-trimester assessment of uterine scar in women with prior Cesarean section predict uterine rupture?
    Jastrow, N.
    Vikhareva, O.
    Gauthier, R. J.
    Irion, O.
    Boulvain, M.
    Bujold, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 47 (04) : 410 - 414
  • [30] Prospective Evaluation of the Ultrasound Signs Proposed for the Description of Uterine Niche in Nonpregnant Women
    Feldman, Noa
    Maymon, Ron
    Jauniaux, Eric
    Manoach, Danielle
    Mor, Matan
    Marczak, Ewa
    Melcer, Yaakov
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (04) : 917 - 923