Aeroelastic analysis of wind turbines using a tightly coupled CFD-CSD method

被引:44
|
作者
Carrion, M. [1 ]
Steijl, R. [1 ]
Woodgate, M. [1 ]
Barakos, G. N. [1 ]
Munduate, X. [2 ]
Gomez-Iradi, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Engn, Computat Fluid Dynam Lab, Liverpool L69 3GH, Merseyside, England
[2] Natl Renewable Energy Ctr Spain, Sarriguren 31621, Navarra, Spain
关键词
MEXICO wind turbine; NREL Phase VI wind turbine; Aeroelasticity; CFD-CSD coupling; Flapping modes; PART II; MODEL; BLADES; AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONS; SIMULATION; AIRFOILS; ROTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.06.029
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper presents aeroelastic analyses of wind turbines, using the compressible flow Helicopter Multi-Block (HMB2) solver of Liverpool University, coupled with a Computational Structural Dynamics method. For this study, the MEXICO and NREL Phase VI wind turbines were employed. A static aeroelastic method was first employed for the analysis of the MEXICO blade and the effect of the torsional stiffness was studied at 10,15 and 24 m/s axial wind speeds. The torsional deformations showed strong dependency on this parameter and the blade region from mid-span to the tip was the most susceptible to aeroelastic effects. The work progressed by studying both the static and dynamic response on the NREL wind turbine, where the nacelle and the tower were considered. Mean deflections between the static and dynamic methods showed consistency and, due to the structural properties of this blade, flapping modes were dominant. The dynamic aeroelastic method enabled an assessment of the effect of flapping on the blade loads, in conjunction with the effect of tower. Aeroelastic effects were found to be secondary for the MEXICO blade, but had a stronger effect on the larger NREL Phase VI blade. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 415
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Numerical analysis of geometrical nonlinear aeroelasticity with CFD/CSD method
    Nie, Xueyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR SCIENCES AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2021, 22 (3-4) : 243 - 253
  • [22] Aeroelastic analysis of a wind turbine blade using the harmonic balance method
    Howison, Jason
    Thomas, Jeffrey
    Ekici, Kivanc
    WIND ENERGY, 2018, 21 (04) : 226 - 241
  • [23] Transient analysis of H-type Vertical Axis Wind Turbines using CFD
    Maalouly, M.
    Souaiby, M.
    ElCheikh, A.
    Issa, J. S.
    Elkhoury, M.
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 4570 - 4588
  • [24] Nonlinear Panel Flutter Analysis Based on an Improved CFD/CSD Coupled Procedure
    An, Xiaomin
    Xu, Min
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2014, 98 (06): : 601 - 629
  • [25] High-fidelity CFD simulations of two wind turbines in arrays using nonlinear frequency domain solution method
    Naung, Shine Win
    Nakhchi, Mahdi Erfanian
    Rahmati, Mohammad
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 174 : 984 - 1005
  • [26] CFD Design of Urban Wind Turbines: A Review and Critical Analysis
    Rodriguez, Christian, V
    Rios, Alberto
    Luyo, Jaime E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (02): : 618 - +
  • [27] Nonlinear frequency domain solution method for aerodynamic and aeromechanical analysis of wind turbines
    Naung, Shine Win
    Rahmati, Mohammad
    Farokhi, Hamed
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 167 : 66 - 81
  • [28] CFD based synergistic analysis of wind turbines for roof mounted integration
    Larin, P.
    Paraschivoiu, M.
    Aygun, C.
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2016, 156 : 1 - 13
  • [29] Comparative Study of Soft In-Plane and Stiff In-Plane Tiltrotor Blade Aerodynamics in Conversion Flight, Using CFD-CSD Coupling Approach
    Hu, Zhiyuan
    Yu, Peng
    Xu, Guohua
    Shi, Yongjie
    Gu, Feng
    Zou, Aijun
    AEROSPACE, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [30] A CFD-CSD coupling method for simulating the dynamic impact and expulsion of fragile foreign objects from the 'inlet-bypass duct' junction of a turboprop aircraft
    Baigang, Mi
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2022, 16 (01) : 73 - 94