Platform methods: studying platform urbanism outside the black box

被引:54
作者
Fields, Desiree [1 ]
Bissell, David [2 ]
Macrorie, Rachel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Geog, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Geog, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Sheffield, Urban Inst, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Platform urbanism; counter-mapping; narrative methods; proxying; CITIES;
D O I
10.1080/02723638.2020.1730642
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This intervention reflects on critical perspectives on algorithms and geographical work on the urban-digital interface to highlight a set of approaches for studying the politics of platform urbanism. In several ways, platforms may be understood as black boxes due to the proprietary nature of algorithms, the secrecy of corporate ownership structures, and the emphasis on confidentiality and privacy in the venture capital industry. While thus raising concerns about scrutiny and accountability, inclinations to "open the black box" of platforms reflect a limited and limiting horizon of political possibility. In a different vein, geographers concerned with the digital-urban interface are working to think about the potential for a counter-politics that is not rooted exclusively in resistance or antagonism. Drawing on these insights, this intervention complements recent work on digital methods by emphasizing tracing, counter-mapping, and proxying as approaches that do not privilege the revelation of visibility so much as potentiality, slipperiness, and movement.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 468
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability [J].
Ananny, Mike ;
Crawford, Kate .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2018, 20 (03) :973-989
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The Black Box Society
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ALGORITHMS OPPRESSIO, DOI [DOI 10.18574/NYU/9781479833641.001.0001, 10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001, DOI 10.2307/J.CTT1PWT9W5]
[4]   Digital turn, digital geographies? [J].
Ash, James ;
Kitchin, Rob ;
Leszczynski, Agnieszka .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 42 (01) :25-43
[5]  
Axelrad J., 2014, NY TIMES
[6]  
Barns S., 2020, PLATFORM URBANISM NE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-32-9725-8
[7]   Negotiating the platform pivot: From participatory digital ecosystems to infrastructures of everyday life [J].
Barns, Sarah .
GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2019, 13 (09)
[8]  
Bates J., 2017, J DOC, V74, P412
[9]   Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows [J].
Bates, Jo ;
Lin, Yu-Wei ;
Goodale, Paula .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2016, 3 (02) :1-12
[10]   Automation interrupted: How autonomous vehicle accidents transform the material politics of automation [J].
Bissell, David .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 65 :57-66