How secure are national energy systems: A dynamic assessment approach

被引:7
作者
Du, Huibin [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zhenni [1 ]
Brown, Marilyn A. [3 ]
Yin, Yangyang [1 ]
Zuo, Jian [4 ]
Chai, Lihe [5 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Univ Adelaide, ECIC, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[5] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Energy security; Maximum flux principle; Self-organizing map; Evaluation model; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105666
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A self-organizing map (SOM) method is adopted in this paper following the maximum flux principle (MFP) to evaluate the energy security level of 30 countries. An integrated and comprehensive index is proposed, which consists of sixteen indicators spanning three dimensions - energy production, energy consumption and environment. Results show that the energy security level varied significantly from 1.3 to 5.6 among these 30 countries. Based on a cluster analysis of sixteen indicators, the 30 countries can be classified into five categories representing low energy security (China and India), consumption-oriented energy security (many industrialized nations, security based on high and very high energy production (predominantly OPEC members), and high and diversified energy security (Norway). This study also revealed that, during 2001-2012, the countries are struggling to develop a more security energy system. For example, the energy security level of twenty countries improved gradually especially in Kazakhstan and Russia which energy security level increased by more than 0.65. But the energy security of Qatar has decreased by 0.434 from 2001 to 2012. This is closely related to each country's resources endowment, energy technology and national policy. Thus it is necessary to develop a differentiated energy policy system according to each country's economic social, political and resource situations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   A framework for evaluating Singapore's energy security [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Choong, W. L. ;
Ng, T. S. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 148 :314-325
[2]   Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Choong, W. L. ;
Ng, T. S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1077-1093
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[4]  
[Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE GLOBA
[5]   ENERGY SECURITY: INSIGHTS FROM A TEN COUNTRY COMPARISON [J].
Bambawale, Malavika Jain ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 23 (04) :559-586
[6]   China's energy security: The perspective of energy users [J].
Bambawale, Malavika Jain ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (05) :1949-1956
[7]  
Bielecki J., 2002, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, V42, P235, DOI [10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00137-0, DOI 10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00137-0]
[8]   Forty years of energy security trends: A comparative assessment of 22 industrialized countries [J].
Brown, Marilyn A. ;
Wang, Yu ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. ;
D'Agostino, Anthony Louis .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 4 :64-77
[9]   Indicators of security of natural gas supply in Asia [J].
Cabalu, Helen .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (01) :218-225
[10]   A theoretical analysis of bubble interaction in boiling systems [J].
Chai, LH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2004, 43 (11) :1067-1073