Volume growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms correlates with baseline volume and increasing finite element analysis-derived rupture risk

被引:66
作者
Liljeqvist, Moritz Lindquist [1 ]
Hultgren, Rebecka [1 ,2 ]
Gasser, T. Christian [3 ]
Roy, Joy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Royal Inst Technol, Dept Solid Mech, Sch Engn Sci, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
WALL STRESS; INTRALUMINAL THROMBUS; INTERVALS; DIAMETER; REPRODUCIBILITY; CALCIFICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; INTACT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2015.11.051
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The diagnosis and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) currently relies on the aortic maximal diameter, which grows in an unpredictable manner. Infrarenal aortic volume has recently become clinically feasible to measure, and an estimate of biomechanical rupture risk derived from finite element analysis, the peak wall rupture index (PWRI), has been shown to predict AAA rupture. Our objective was to ascertain how well volume growth correlates with baseline volume and increasing PWRI, compared with the maximal diameter. Methods: We retrospectively identified 41 AAA patients (nine women, 32 men) at our institution who had undergone two computed tomography angiographies with an interval of 8 to 17 months. Digital three-dimensional reproductions of the aneurysms were segmented from the 82 computed tomography angiographies. AAA diameter, volume, and PWRI were measured and calculated with finite element analysis software. Growth rates of diameter and volume were related to baseline diameter and volume as well as to change rates of PWRI. Significant growth was defined as growth exceeding our interobserver 95% limits of agreement. Results: Diameter growth rate did not correlate with baseline diameter (r = 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.17 to 0.45), but volume growth rate correlated with baseline volume (r = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.30-0.75). The correlation between baseline volume and volume growth rate was stronger than the correlation between baseline diameter and diameter growth rate (95% CI, 0.086-0.71). Increasing PWRI correlated with volume growth rate (r = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40-0.87) but not with diameter growth rate (r = 0.044; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.51), and the difference between the correlation coefficients was significant (95% CI, 0.11-1.16). Conclusions: Volume better predicts aneurysm growth rate and correlates stronger with increasing estimated biomechanical rupture risk compared with diameter. Our results support the notion of monitoring all three dimensions of an AAA.
引用
收藏
页码:1434 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Reconstruction and Finite Element Mesh Generation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms From Computerized Tomography Angiography Data With Minimal User Interactions [J].
Auer, M. ;
Gasser, T. Christian .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 29 (04) :1022-1028
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Surveillance Intervals for Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms A Meta-analysis [J].
Bown, Matthew J. ;
Sweeting, Michael J. ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Powell, Janet T. ;
Thompson, Simon G. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (08) :806-813
[4]   Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion - Risk factors and time intervals for surveillance [J].
Brady, AR ;
Thompson, SG ;
Fowkes, FGR ;
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Powell, JT .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (01) :16-21
[5]   Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance [J].
Brown, LC ;
Powell, JT .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :289-296
[6]   The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines [J].
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Brewster, David C. ;
Dalman, Ronald L. ;
Makaroun, Michel S. ;
Illig, Karl A. ;
Sicard, Gregorio A. ;
Timaran, Carlos H. ;
Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr. ;
Veith, Frank J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 :2S-49S
[7]   Prognosis of patients turned down for conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the endovascular and sonographic era: Szilagyi revisited? [J].
Conway, KP ;
Byrne, J ;
Townsend, M ;
Lane, IF .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (04) :752-757
[8]  
DIEDENHOFEN B, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0121945, DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0121945]
[9]   A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known [J].
Du Bois, D ;
Du Bois, EF .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1916, 17 (06) :863-871
[10]   Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: Wall stress versus diameter [J].
Fillinger, MF ;
Marra, SP ;
Raghavan, ML ;
Kennedy, FE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (04) :724-732