Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without concomitant pyelolithotomy

被引:2
|
作者
Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa [1 ]
Yucetas, Ugur [1 ]
Karabay, Emre [1 ]
Sonmezay, Erkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2019年 / 45卷 / 05期
关键词
Laparoscopy; Pyeloform [Supplementary Concept; Cakut [Supplementary Concept; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; PEDIATRIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; ANTEGRADE ENDOPYELOTOMY; LONG; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; STONES; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0781
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy and compare results with a cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty without pyelolithotomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of 43 patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty between December 2012 and July 2018 at our department. Eighteen patients (42%) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. The results of patients with renal stones were compared with 25 matched patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty without concomitant renal stones. Demographic data, operative and stone parameters were compared between the groups. Results: The groups were similar regarding to demographic characteristics. All operations were completed laparoscopically with no conversions to open surgery. In 3 cases without renal stones and 15 cases with renal stones, transposition of the ureter due to crossing vessels was performed. The mean stone size was 13 +/- 5.24 mm, and the median number of stones was 1 (1-18). The success of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without pyelolithotomy was 93.3% and 92.9%, respectively, as confirmed by negative diuretic renogram at postoperative 3rd months. Overall stone-free rate after laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was 93.3%. Mean operative time was 222.6765.71 minutes vs. 219.11 +/- 75.63 minutes for the pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy vs. pyeloplasty, respectively (p=0.88). Conclusions: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective intervention with associated good cosmetic results and high stone-free rates without significant increase in operative time or complications.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 973
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the standard of care for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Kapoor, Anil
    Allard, Christopher B.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (02): : 136 - 138
  • [32] Minimally Invasive Pyelolithotomy: Comparison of Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Techniques
    Corsi, Paolo
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Giampaoli, Marco
    Bianchi, Federico Mineo
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Saraceni, Giacomo
    Garofalo, Marco
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Artibani, Walter
    Porreca, Angelo
    SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL-INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SURGERY AND SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 34
  • [33] Concomitant Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Complicated by Renal Calculi with Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Pyelolithotomy via 19.5F Rigid Nephroscope: A Report of 12 Cases
    An, Lizhe
    Xiong, Liulin
    Chen, Liang
    Ye, Xiongjun
    Huang, Xiaobo
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [34] Secondary Management for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction after Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Re-Do Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
    Zhang, Yucong
    Ouyang, Wei
    Xu, Hao
    Luan, Yang
    Yang, Jun
    Lu, Yuchao
    Hu, Jia
    Liu, Zheng
    Yu, Xiao
    Guan, Wei
    Hu, Zhiquan
    Ye, Zhangqun
    Wang, Shaogang
    Li, Heng
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 103 (04) : 466 - 472
  • [35] Pyeloplasty: pro laparoscopic
    Bader, P.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (05): : 633 - 639
  • [36] A Comparison of Continuous and Interrupted Suturing in Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
    Ramalingam, Manickam
    Murugesan, Anandan
    Senthil, Kallappan
    Pai, Mizar Ganapathy
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (02) : 294 - 300
  • [37] Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic and open Pyeloplasty in Children
    Vauth, F.
    Roesch, W. H.
    UROLOGE, 2017, 56 (08): : 1034 - 1035
  • [38] Laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyelolithotomy and open pyelolithotomy: a comparative study
    Patloo, Asim Mushtaq
    Sarmast, Arif Hussain
    Khan, Mehvish Afzal
    Khan, Muneer A.
    Zaz, Muneer
    Khan, Masarat Ashraf
    Showkat, Hakim Irfan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 38 (04): : 195 - 200
  • [39] Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: Outcomes for primary and secondary repairs, a single institution experience
    Thom, Matthew R.
    Haseebuddin, Mohammed
    Roytman, Timur M.
    Benway, Brian M.
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    Figenshau, Robert S.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2012, 38 (01): : 77 - 83
  • [40] Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Adults: A Comparison Analysis of Primary versus Redo Pyeloplasty in a Single Center
    Dirie, Najib Isse
    Ahmed, Mahad A.
    Mohamed, Mohamed Abdulkadir
    Zhang, Zongbiao
    Wang, Shaogang
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (01) : 45 - 50