The effects of room design on computer-supported collaborative learning in a multi-touch classroom

被引:19
作者
Mercier, Emma M. [1 ]
Higgins, Steven E. [2 ]
Joyce-Gibbons, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, 1310 S 6th St, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Durham, Sch Educ, Leazes Rd, Durham DH1 1TA, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
CSCL; collaborative learning; multi-touch technology; classroom design; primary education; mathematics; INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS; IMPACT; TABLES; METAANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY; TEACHERS; PUPILS;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2014.881392
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While research indicates that technology can be useful for supporting learning and collaboration, there is still relatively little uptake or widespread implementation of these technologies in classrooms. In this paper, we explore one aspect of the development of a multi-touch classroom, looking at two different designs of the classroom environment to explore how classroom layout may influence group interaction and learning. Three classes of students working in groups of four were taught in the traditional forward-facing room condition, while three classes worked in a centered room condition. Our results indicate that while the outcomes on tasks were similar across conditions, groups engaged in more talk (but not more off-task talk) in a centered room layout, than in a traditional forward-facing room. These results suggest that the use of technology in the classroom may be influenced by the location of the technology, both in terms of the learning outcomes and the interaction behaviors of students. The findings highlight the importance of considering the learning environment when designing technology to support learning, and ensuring that integration of technology into formal learning environments is done with attention to how the technology may disrupt, or contribute to, the classroom interaction practices.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 522
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Baines E., 2009, Cambridge Journal of Education, V39, P95, DOI [DOI 10.1080/03057640802701960, 10.1080/03057640802701960]
[2]   A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils' learning [J].
Barrett, Peter ;
Zhang, Yufan ;
Moffat, Joanne ;
Kobbacy, Khairy .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 59 :678-689
[3]  
Barron B., 2008, Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding, P11
[4]   How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? [J].
Buisine, Stephanie ;
Besacier, Guillaume ;
Aoussat, Ameziane ;
Vernier, Frederic .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 28 (01) :49-59
[5]   The effects of whole-class interactive instruction with Single Display Groupware for Triangles [J].
Caballero, Daniela ;
van Riesen, Siswa A. N. ;
Alvarez, Sergio ;
Nussbaum, Miguel ;
de Jong, Ton ;
Alario-Hoyos, Carlos .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2014, 70 :203-211
[6]  
Cuban L., 2001, OVERSOLD UNDERUSED C, P250
[7]   Interactive tabletops in education [J].
Dillenbourg, Pierre ;
Evans, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2011, 6 (04) :491-514
[8]  
Dillenbourg P, 2010, NEW SCIENCE OF LEARNING: COGNITION, COMPUTERS AND COLLABORATION IN EDUCATION, P525, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_26
[9]  
Galton M., 1999, INSIDE PRIMARY CLASS
[10]  
Harris A., 2009, P 9 INT C COMP SUPP, V1, P335