Performance impact of business group affiliation: An analysis of the diversification-performance link in a developing economy

被引:39
作者
Singh, Manohar
Nejadmalayeri, Ali
Mathur, Ike [1 ]
机构
[1] So Illinois Univ, Dept Finance, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Finance, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[3] Willamette Univ, Atkinson Grad Sch Management, Salem, OR 97301 USA
关键词
diversification discount; operating performance; agency cost; business groups; emerging markets;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.024
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To understand the performance implications of corporate strategies as conditioned by business group affiliations, we analyze the relation between corporate diversification and performance for 889 Indian firms. We find that diversified firms perform significantly worse than focused firms and that there exists a significant negative relation between the degree of diversification and firm performance. A comparative analysis of firms affiliated with Indian business groups and those affiliated with MNCs indicates that the sources of negative impact of diversification on performance are conditioned by the nature of a firm's affiliation. For multinational affiliates, diversification is associated with poor asset quality and asset management, which is an indicator of possible agency conflict. For domestic business group affiliates, diversification is associated with cost inefficiencies and poor performance. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 347
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Agency costs and ownership structure [J].
Ang, JS ;
Cole, RA ;
Lin, JW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (01) :81-106
[2]  
BARDHAN P, 1981, POLITICAL EC DEV IND
[3]   DIVERSIFICATIONS EFFECT ON FIRM VALUE [J].
BERGER, PG ;
OFEK, E .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 37 (01) :39-65
[4]   Explaining the diversification discount [J].
Campa, JM ;
Kedia, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (04) :1731-1762
[5]  
CHUHAN P, 1988, J DEV ECON, V55, P439
[6]   Corporate finance in developing countries: New evidence for India [J].
Cobham, D ;
Subramaniam, R .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 26 (06) :1033-1047
[7]   CORPORATE FOCUS AND STOCK RETURNS [J].
COMMENT, R ;
JARRELL, GA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 37 (01) :67-87
[8]   Protected by the family? How closely held family firms protect minority shareholders [J].
de Holan, PM ;
Sanz, L .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2006, 59 (03) :356-359
[9]   Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification [J].
Denis, DJ ;
Denis, DK ;
Sarin, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (01) :135-160
[10]   Capital market development, international integration, legal systems, and the value of corporate diversification: A cross-country analysis [J].
Fauver, L ;
Houston, J ;
Naranjo, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2003, 38 (01) :135-157