The Effect of Financial Incentives on Quality Measures in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:9
作者
Meier, Rahel [1 ,2 ]
Chmiel, Corinne [1 ,2 ]
Valeri, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
Muheim, Leander [1 ,2 ]
Senn, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
Rosemann, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Primary Care, Pestalozzistr 24, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
quality of care; improvement; financial incentives; diabetes mellitus; primary care; spill-over effect; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; OF-CARE; PERFORMANCE; PAY; PHYSICIANS; FEEDBACK; PROGRAM; TAIWAN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-021-06714-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Financial incentives are often used to improve quality of care in chronic care patients. However, the evidence concerning the effect of financial incentives is still inconclusive. Objective To test the effect of financial incentives on quality measures (QMs) in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus in primary care. We incentivized a clinical QM and a process QM to test the effect of financial incentives on different types of QMs and to investigate the spill-over effect on non-incentivized QMs. Design/Participants Parallel cluster randomized controlled trial based on electronic medical records database involving Swiss general practitioners (GPs). Practices were randomly allocated. Intervention All participants received a bimonthly feedback report. The intervention group additionally received potential financial incentives on GP level depending on their performance. Main Measures Between-group differences in proportions of patients fulfilling incentivized QM (process QM of annual HbA1c measurement and clinical QM of blood pressure level below 140/95 mmHg) after 12 months. Key Results Seventy-one GPs (median age 52 years, 72% male) from 43 different practices and subsequently 3838 patients with diabetes mellitus (median age 70 years, 57% male) were included. Proportions of patients with annual HbA1c measurements remained unchanged (intervention group decreased from 79.0 to 78.3%, control group from 81.5 to 81.0%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90-1.32, p = 0.39). Proportions of patients with blood pressure below 140/95 improved from 49.9 to 52.5% in the intervention group and decreased from 51.2 to 49.0% in the control group (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99-1.36, p = 0.06). Proportions of non-incentivized process QMs increased significantly in the intervention group. Conclusion GP level financial incentives did not result in more frequent HbA1c measurements or in improved blood pressure control. Interestingly, we could confirm a spill-over effect on non-incentivized process QMs. Yet, the mechanism of spill-over effects of financial incentives is largely unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 564
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Asch, David A. ;
Troxel, Andrea B. ;
Stewart, Walter F. ;
Sequist, Thomas D. ;
Jones, James B. ;
Hirsch, AnneMarie G. ;
Hoffer, Karen ;
Zhu, Jingsan ;
Wang, Wenli ;
Hodlofski, Amanda ;
Frasch, Antonette B. ;
Weiner, Mark G. ;
Finnerty, Darra D. ;
Rosenthal, Meredith B. ;
Gangemi, Kelsey ;
Volpp, Kevin G. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (18) :1926-1935
[2]  
Association FSM, 2020, ONLINE ABFRAGETOOL F
[3]   Effect of Pay-for-Performance Incentives on Quality of Care in Small Practices With Electronic Health Records A Randomized Trial [J].
Bardach, Naomi S. ;
Wang, Jason J. ;
De Leon, Samantha F. ;
Shih, Sarah C. ;
Boscardin, W. John ;
Goldman, L. Elizabeth ;
Dudley, R. Adams .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (10) :1051-1059
[4]   Real-time Feedback in Pay-for-Performance: Does More Information Lead to Improvement? [J].
Bond, Amelia M. ;
Volpp, Kevin G. ;
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. ;
Caldarella, Kristen ;
Hodlofski, Amanda ;
Sacks, Lee ;
Patel, Pankaj ;
Sokol, Kara ;
Vittore, Salvatore ;
Calgano, Don ;
Nelson, Carrie ;
Weng, Kevin ;
Troxel, Andrea ;
Navathe, Amol .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (09) :1737-1743
[5]   A Pay-For-Performance Program In Taiwan Improved Care For Some Diabetes Patients, But Doctors May Have Excluded Sicker Ones [J].
Chang, Ray-E. ;
Lin, Shih-Pi ;
Aron, David Clark .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (01) :93-102
[6]   The Unintended Consequence of Diabetes Mellitus Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Program in Taiwan: Are Patients with More Comorbidities or More Severe Conditions Likely to Be Excluded from the P4P Program? [J].
Chen, Tsung-Tai ;
Chung, Kuo-Piao ;
Lin, I-Chin ;
Lai, Mei-Shu .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (01) :47-60
[7]   The FIRE project A milestone for research in primary care in Switzerland [J].
Chmiel, Corinne ;
Bhend, Heinz ;
Senn, Oliver ;
Zoller, Marco ;
Rosemann, Thomas .
SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2011, 141
[8]   High-performing physicians are more likely to participate in a research study: findings from a quality improvement study [J].
Dahrouge, Simone ;
Armstrong, Catherine Deri ;
Hogg, William ;
Singh, Jatinderpreet ;
Liddy, Clare .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
[9]   Swiss Quality and Outcomes Framework: Quality Indicators for Diabetes Management in Swiss Primary Care Based on Electronic Medical Records [J].
Djalali, S. ;
Frei, A. ;
Tandjung, R. ;
Baltensperger, A. ;
Rosemann, T. .
GERONTOLOGY, 2014, 60 (03) :263-273
[10]   Impact of Provider Incentives on Quality and Value of Health Care [J].
Doran, Tim ;
Maurer, Kristin A. ;
Ryan, Andrew M. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 38, 2017, 38 :449-465