Teach the Controversy The Relationship Between Sources and Frames in Reporting the Intelligent Design Debate

被引:10
作者
Grimm, Joshua [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
framing; intelligent design; evolution; science; source;
D O I
10.1177/1075547009335346
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examined sources and frames in the debate over whether to teach evolution or intelligent design in public schools. A content analysis of 12 newspapers from Kansas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania was conducted to see how geography and sourcing affected the framing of the controversial science issue. Established patterns of reporting science were repeated in the news coverage, but location and sources played an important role in how the issue was framed. The frames; varied by region, suggesting a new direction for future research of framing.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 186
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
*ANN PUBL POL CTR, 2004, WHIT EV BORN AG PROT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INTELLIGENT DESIGN C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, UNINTELLIGENT DESIGN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Journal of Communication
[5]  
Berra T.M., 1990, EVOLUTION MYTH CREAT
[6]  
Bishop George., 2005, ILLUSION PUBLIC OPIN
[7]   UNCERTAINTY AS SYMBOLIC ACTION IN DISPUTES AMONG EXPERTS [J].
CAMPBELL, BL .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1985, 15 (03) :429-453
[8]   US elite and non-elite newspapers' portrayal of the iraq war: A comparison of frames and source use [J].
Carpenter, Serena .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2007, 84 (04) :761-776
[9]   The neglect of power in recent framing research [J].
Carragee, KM ;
Roefs, W .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2004, 54 (02) :214-233
[10]   Framing theory [J].
Chong, Dennis ;
Druckman, James N. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 10 :103-126