Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management

被引:35
|
作者
Braden, JB
Johnston, DM
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Landscape Architecture, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE | 2004年 / 130卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(498)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Using benefits transfer methods, this paper assesses the downstream economic consequences of development designs that promote greater on-site water retention. It concludes that on-site retention provides many services that are conceptually distinct but empirically intertwined. Flood mitigation and water quality protection are the most important of these services. For residential properties, the economic value of those services is on the order of 0-5% of market value depending on the difference that retention makes to downstream flood exposure. For water quality improvements, the increases range up to 15% of market value for waterside residences where clarity of the water quality is greatly improved. The increases are much less for improvements that are less visible, properties that are not developed, and properties not adjacent to the watercourse. Our best estimate of total benefits to property owners is 2-5% of property value on average for all properties in the flood plain. The public sector realizes additional benefits through smaller bridges, culverts, and other drainage infrastructure and through increased aquifer recharge. Cities and industries may avoid costly upgrades to waste water treatment facilities if low flows increase. It is difficult to generalize about the economic value of the latter effects.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 505
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparative analysis of urban forests for storm-water management
    Rahman, Mohammad A.
    Pawijit, Yanin
    Xu, Chao
    Moser-Reischl, Astrid
    Pretzsch, Hans
    Roetzer, Thomas
    Pauleit, Stephan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [22] Storm-water management implementation through modeling and GIS
    Shamsi, UM
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1996, 122 (02): : 114 - 127
  • [23] Multiyear and seasonal variation of infiltration from storm-water best management practices
    Emerson, Clay H.
    Traver, Robert G.
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (05) : 598 - 605
  • [24] Storm-water management - Data management key to inlet inventory project
    Hartman, J
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2002, 72 (09): : 40 - 41
  • [25] An integrated storm-water management to maintain and protect drinking water sources
    Michel, P
    22ND INTERNATIONAL WATER SERVICES CONGRESS AND EXHIBITION, 2000, 18 (1-2): : 568 - 570
  • [26] Storm-water management - The convertible tunnel: Malaysian project to double as storm drain
    Binns, J
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2004, 74 (04): : 24 - 25
  • [27] Off-Stream Detention Design for Storm-Water Management
    Guo, James C. Y.
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (04) : 371 - 376
  • [28] GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS IN URBAN STORM-WATER MANAGEMENT
    MEYER, SP
    SALEM, TH
    LABADIE, JW
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1993, 119 (02): : 206 - 228
  • [29] Storm-water management - Athletic field doubles as retention basin
    不详
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2002, 72 (10): : 22 - 23
  • [30] Sediment discharge from a storm-water retention pond
    Cheng, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (05) : 606 - 612