Field Evaluation of an Automated Pollen Sensor

被引:13
|
作者
Jiang, Chenyang [1 ]
Wang, Wenhao [2 ]
Du, Linlin [2 ]
Huang, Guanyu [3 ]
McConaghy, Caitlin [2 ]
Fineman, Stanley [4 ]
Liu, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Gangarosa Dept Environm Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Spelman Coll, Dept Environm & Hlth Sci, Atlanta, GA 30314 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Atlanta Allergy & Asthma Clin, Marietta, GA 30060 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
sensors; pollen monitoring; automation; data analysis; real-time monitoring; ALLERGENIC POLLEN; ROTOROD; LEVEL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19116444
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Seasonal pollen is a common cause of allergic respiratory disease. In the United States, pollen monitoring occurs via manual counting, a method which is both labor-intensive and has a considerable time delay. In this paper, we report the field-testing results of a new, automated, real-time pollen imaging sensor in Atlanta, GA. Methods: We first compared the pollen concentrations measured by an automated real-time pollen sensor (APS-300, Pollen Sense LLC) collocated with a Rotorod M40 sampler in 2020 at an allergy clinic in northwest Atlanta. An internal consistency assessment was then conducted with two collocated APS-300 sensors in downtown Atlanta during the 2021 pollen season. We also investigated the spatial heterogeneity of pollen concentrations using the APS-300 measurements. Results: Overall, the daily pollen concentrations reported by the APS-300 and the Rotorod M40 sampler with manual counting were strongly correlated (r = 0.85) during the peak pollen season. The APS-300 reported fewer tree pollen taxa, resulting in a slight underestimation of total pollen counts. Both the APS-300 and Rotorod M40 reported Quercus (Oak) and Pinus (Pine) as dominant pollen taxa during the peak tree pollen season. Pollen concentrations reported by APS-300 in the summer and fall were less accurate. The daily total and speciated pollen concentrations reported by two collocated APS-300 sensors were highly correlated (r = 0.93-0.99). Pollen concentrations showed substantial spatial and temporal heterogeneity in terms of peak levels at three locations in Atlanta. Conclusions: The APS-300 sensor was able to provide internally consistent, real-time pollen concentrations that are strongly correlated with the current gold-standard measurements during the peak pollen season. When compared with manual counting approaches, the fully automated sensor has the significant advantage of being mobile with the ability to provide real-time pollen data. However, the sensor's weed and grass pollen identification algorithms require further improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Laboratory Evaluation of the New Automated Pollen Sensor Beenose: Pollen Discrimination Using Machine Learning Techniques
    El Azari, Houssam
    Renard, Jean-Baptiste
    Lauthier, Johann
    de Wit, Thierry Dudok
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (06)
  • [2] Automated sensor-driven mapping of reinforcement bars
    Shohet, IM
    Wang, C
    Warszawski, A
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2002, 11 (04) : 391 - 407
  • [3] Evaluation of the repeatability of a Landolt-C based, automated sensor resolution assessment methodology
    Pinkus, Alan R.
    Dommett, David W.
    Task, H. Lee
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, SENSOR/INFORMATION FUSION, AND TARGET RECOGNITION XXV, 2016, 9842
  • [4] Automated pollen monitoring system using laser optics for observing seasonal changes in the concentration of total airborne pollen
    Shigeto Kawashima
    Michel Thibaudon
    Soken Matsuda
    Toshio Fujita
    Natalie Lemonis
    Bernard Clot
    Gilles Oliver
    Aerobiologia, 2017, 33 : 351 - 362
  • [5] Automated pollen monitoring system using laser optics for observing seasonal changes in the concentration of total airborne pollen
    Kawashima, Shigeto
    Thibaudon, Michel
    Matsuda, Soken
    Fujita, Toshio
    Lemonis, Natalie
    Clot, Bernard
    Oliver, Gilles
    AEROBIOLOGIA, 2017, 33 (03) : 351 - 362
  • [6] Field Evaluation of Smart Sensor System for Plant Disease Prediction Using LSTM Network
    Patle, Kamlesh S.
    Saini, Riya
    Kumar, Ahlad
    Palaparthy, Vinay S.
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (04) : 3715 - 3725
  • [7] A Smart Sensor Network for an Automated Urban Greenhouse
    Meah, Kala
    Forsyth, Jason
    Moscola, James
    2019 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS, ELECTRICAL AND SIGNAL PROCESSING TECHNIQUES (ICREST), 2019, : 23 - 27
  • [8] Smart Wireless Sensor Network for Automated Greenhouse
    Jahnavi, V. Sri
    Ahamed, Shaik Fayaz
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2015, 61 (02) : 180 - 185
  • [9] Preliminary evaluation of a novel, fully automated, Telenostic device for rapid field-diagnosis of cattle parasites
    Elghryani, Nagwa
    Crispell, Joseph
    Ebrahimi, Roohollah
    Krivoruchko, Michael
    Lobaskin, Vladimir
    McOwan, Trish
    O'Connor, William
    Power, Eamonn
    Voisin, Bruno
    Scholz, Dimitri
    de Waal, Theo
    PARASITOLOGY, 2020, 147 (11) : 1249 - 1253
  • [10] Thirty-four years of pollen monitoring: an evaluation of the temporal variation of pollen seasons in Belgium
    Hoebeke, Lucie
    Bruffaerts, Nicolas
    Verstraeten, Caroline
    Delcloo, Andy
    De Smedt, Tom
    Packeu, Ann
    Detandt, Monique
    Hendrickx, Marijke
    AEROBIOLOGIA, 2018, 34 (02) : 139 - 155