On the repeated measures designs and sample sizes for randomized controlled trials

被引:22
|
作者
Tango, Toshiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Med Stat, Minato Ku, 2-9-6 Higashi Shimbashi, Tokyo 1050021, Japan
关键词
Likelihood-based ignorable analysis; Logistic regression model; Missing data; Poisson regression model; Pre-post design; LONGITUDINAL DESIGNS; COVARIANCE; COUNTS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1093/biostatistics/kxv047
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
For the analysis of longitudinal or repeated measures data, generalized linear mixed-effects models provide a flexible and powerful tool to deal with heterogeneity among subject response profiles. However, the typical statistical design adopted in usual randomized controlled trials is an analysis of covariance type analysis using a pre-defined pair of "pre-post" data, in which pre-(baseline) data are used as a covariate for adjustment together with other covariates. Then, the major design issue is to calculate the sample size or the number of subjects allocated to each treatment group. In this paper, we propose a new repeated measures design and sample size calculations combined with generalized linear mixed-effects models that depend not only on the number of subjects but on the number of repeated measures before and after randomization per subject used for the analysis. The main advantages of the proposed design combined with the generalized linear mixed-effects models are (1) it can easily handle missing data by applying the likelihood-based ignorable analyses under the missing at random assumption and (2) it may lead to a reduction in sample size, compared with the simple pre-post design. The proposed designs and the sample size calculations are illustrated with real data arising from randomized controlled trials.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 349
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Eyes or Subjects: Are Ophthalmic Randomized Controlled Trials Properly Designed and Analyzed?
    Lee, Chun Fan
    Cheng, Andy Chi On
    Fong, Daniel Yee Tak
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (04) : 869 - 872
  • [42] A System for Rapidly Yet Rigorously Evaluating the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Smith, Eric G.
    Grigorian, Hannah L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 43 (04) : 306 - 312
  • [43] Hierarchical Bayes Approach to Estimate the Treatment Effect for Randomized Controlled Trials
    Liang, Xinya
    Kamata, Akihito
    Li, Ji
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2020, 80 (06) : 1090 - 1114
  • [44] Simple Bayesian models for missing binary outcomes in randomized controlled trials
    Kaplan, Adam
    Nelson, David
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (24) : 4377 - 4391
  • [45] Selection, Confounding, and Attrition Biases in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rehabilitation Interventions What Are They and How Can They Affect Randomized Controlled Trials Results? Basic Information for Junior Researchers and Clinicians
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    De Oliveira-Souza, Ana Izabela Sobral
    Mohamad, Norazlin
    de Castro Carletti, Ester Moreira
    Fuentes, Jorge
    Ballenberger, Nikolaus
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2022, 101 (11) : 1042 - 1055
  • [46] Sample size calculation for cluster randomized trials with zero-inflated count outcomes
    Zhou, Zhengyang
    Li, Dateng
    Zhang, Song
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (12) : 2191 - 2204
  • [47] The Role of a Quadratic Term in Estimating the Average Treatment Effect From Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Trials With Missing Data
    Yang, Manshu
    Wang, Lijuan
    Maxwell, Scott E.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2024,
  • [48] Intention-to-Treat in Randomized Controlled Trials: Recommendations for a Total Trial Strategy
    Polit, Denise F.
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2010, 33 (04) : 355 - 368
  • [49] Data withdrawal in randomized controlled trials: Defining the problem and proposing solutions A commentary
    Ye, Chenglin
    Giangregorio, Lora
    Holbrook, Anne
    Pullenayegum, Eleanor
    Goldsmith, Charlie H.
    Thabane, Lehana
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 32 (03) : 318 - 322
  • [50] Relative Risk Estimation in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Comparison of Methods for Independent Observations
    Yelland, Lisa N.
    Salter, Amy B.
    Ryan, Philip
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2011, 7 (01):