Collaborative design as a form of professional development

被引:127
作者
Voogt, Joke [1 ,2 ]
Laferriere, Therese [3 ]
Breuleux, Alain [4 ]
Itow, Rebecca C. [5 ]
Hickey, Daniel T. [5 ]
McKenney, Susan [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Windesheim Univ, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 0G4, Canada
[5] Indiana Univ, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[6] Univ Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[7] Open Univ Netherlands, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Collaborative design; Teacher learning; Cases; Activity theory; Situated learning; LEARNING ACTIVITIES; CURRICULUM; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Increasingly, teacher involvement in collaborative design of curriculum is viewed as a form of professional development. However, the research base for this stance is limited. While it is assumed that the activities teachers undertake during collaborative design of curricular materials can be beneficial for teacher learning, only a few studies involving such efforts exist. Additionally many lack specific theoretical frameworks for robust investigation of teacher learning by design. The situative perspective articulated by Greeno et al. (1998) and third-generation activity theory as developed by Engestrom (1987) constitute useful conceptual frameworks to describe and investigate teacher learning by collaborative design. In this contribution, three key features derived from these two theories, situatedness, agency and the cyclical nature of learning and change, are used to describe three cases of collaborative design in three different settings. Grounded on this theoretical basis and a synthesis of the three case descriptions, we propose an empirically and theoretically informed agenda for studying teacher learning by collaborative design.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 282
页数:24
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [21] Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy: A cross-case analysis
    Cviko, Amina
    McKenney, Susan
    Voogt, Joke
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2014, 72 : 68 - 79
  • [22] DOYLE W, 1978, INTERCHANGE, V8, P1
  • [23] Elmore R., 1999, TEACHING LEARNING PR, P236
  • [24] Engestrom Y., 1999, Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research
  • [25] From design experiments to formative interventions
    Engestrom, Yrjo
    [J]. THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 21 (05) : 598 - 628
  • [26] Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges
    Engestrom, Yrjo
    Sannino, Annalisa
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2010, 5 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [27] Engeström Y, 2006, HUM FACTORS ERGON, P3
  • [28] Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom
    Engle, RA
    Conant, FR
    [J]. COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2002, 20 (04) : 399 - 483
  • [29] Comparing the Impact of Online and Face-to-Face Professional Development in the Context of Curriculum Implementation
    Fishman, Barry
    Konstantopoulos, Spyros
    Kubitskey, Beth W.
    Vath, Richard
    Park, Gina
    Johnson, Heather
    Edelson, Daniel C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2013, 64 (05) : 426 - 438
  • [30] What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers
    Garet, MS
    Porter, AC
    Desimone, L
    Birman, BF
    Yoon, KS
    [J]. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2001, 38 (04) : 915 - 945