Patient empowerment: Emancipatory or technological practice?

被引:20
作者
Piper, Stewart [1 ]
机构
[1] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Care, Peterborough PE3 6DA, England
关键词
Patient empowerment; Emancipatory or technological practice; Qualitative research; Medical model; CENTERED CARE; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.032
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the meaning of the theme of empowerment from research on health promotion in nursing from the perspective of nurses participating in the study. Methods: Manual data analysis and QSR NUD*IST Vivo were used to analyse the data generated by individual and focus group interviews and the critical incident technique with 32 qualified nurses working in an acute hospital setting in the UK. Results: The participants identified a number of issues related to the theme of empowerment. These included the nurse as patient informer, psychological supporter and rapport builder and the concepts of informed choice/decision making, gatekeeping, coping, patient assertiveness, self-esteem and confidence. Conclusion: Empowerment is a complex, multi-dimensional, contested concept which can reflect a broad socio-political agenda, a radical emancipatory process or, as the findings from this qualitative study suggest, pragmatic interventions operating within the confines of a slightly modified medical model. Practice implications: If the reader deems the findings are transferable to their clinical milieu then the implications for practice relate to the need for careful consideration about empowerment in relation to operational definitions for practice, how terminology and related intervention is contextualised and the relationship between pragmatic empowerment and the medical paradigm. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 177
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, DOI DOI 10.1002/NUR.4770140111
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1999, SAV LIV OUR HLTH NAT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, EXP PAT NEW APPR CHR
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2004, PAT PUBL INV HLTH EV
  • [6] [Anonymous], CHOOS HLTH MAK HLTH
  • [7] BEATTIE Alan., 1991, The Sociology of the Health Service. Eds, P162
  • [8] Benner P., 1984, From novice to expert: Excellent and power in clinical nursing practice
  • [9] CAREY MA, 1994, CRITICAL ISSUES IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS, P225
  • [10] Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race
    Cooper, LA
    Roter, DL
    Johnson, RL
    Ford, DE
    Steinwachs, DM
    Powe, NR
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 139 (11) : 907 - 915