Does Strategic Planning Improve Organizational Performance? A Meta-Analysis

被引:207
作者
George, Bert [1 ,2 ]
Walker, Richard M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Monster, Joost [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Publ Governance & Management, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Erasmus Univ, Publ Management, Dept Publ Adm & Sociol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Liberal Arts & Social Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] City Univ Hong Kong, Lab Publ Management & Policy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ Policy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Focus Orange, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
MUNICIPAL-GOVERNMENT; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; SECTOR; WORK;
D O I
10.1111/puar.13104
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Strategic planning is a widely adopted management approach in contemporary organizations. Underlying its popularity is the assumption that it is a successful practice in public and private organizations that has positive consequences for organizational performance. Nonetheless, strategic planning has been criticized for being overly rational and for inhibiting strategic thinking. This article undertakes a meta-analysis of 87 correlations from 31 empirical studies and asks, Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A random-effects meta-analysis reveals that strategic planning has a positive, moderate, and significant impact on organizational performance. Meta-regression analysis suggests that the positive impact of strategic planning on organizational performance is strongest when performance is measured as effectiveness and when strategic planning is measured as formal strategic planning. This impact holds across sectors (private and public) and countries (U.S. and non-U.S. contexts). Implications for public administration theory, research, and practice are discussed in the conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 819
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Building Evidence for Public Human Resource Management: Using Middle Range Theory to Link Theory and Data [J].
Abner, Gordon B. ;
Kim, Sun Young ;
Perry, James L. .
REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION, 2017, 37 (02) :139-159
[2]   Performance in Public Organizations: Clarifying the Conceptual Space [J].
Andersen, Lotte Bogh ;
Boesen, Andreas ;
Pedersen, Lene Holm .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (06) :852-+
[3]  
Andrews K.R., 1980, The Concept of Corporate Strategy
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ENTREPRENEURIAL STAT
[5]   Emergent strategic management and planning mechanisms in complex adaptive systems - The case of the UK best value initiative [J].
Bovaird, Tony .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 10 (03) :319-340
[6]   Plans, performance information and accountability: The case of best value [J].
Boyne, G ;
Gould-Williams, J ;
Law, J ;
Walker, R .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2002, 80 (04) :691-710
[7]   Public and private management: What's the difference? [J].
Boyne, GA .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2002, 39 (01) :97-122
[8]  
Bryson J., 2011, Implementing and sustaining your strategic plan: A workbook for public and nonprofit organizations
[9]  
Bryson J.M., 2004, Public Management Review. p, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1080/14719030410001675722
[10]   INITIATION OF STRATEGIC-PLANNING BY GOVERNMENTS [J].
BRYSON, JM ;
ROERING, WD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1988, 48 (06) :995-1004