Governments, reciprocal exchange and trust among business associates

被引:56
作者
Rao, AN [1 ]
Pearce, JL
Xin, K
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Grad Sch Management, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] China Europe Int Business Sch, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
trust; social exchange; governments; guanxi;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400116
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Both Pearce and Molm have conducted research in interpersonal trust. Here we apply their work to international business by deriving hypotheses from their work, some compatible, some conflicting. We test them with data from managers in China, the United States, Hong Kong and Thailand using measures from the World Bank, World Competitiveness Report, and Transparency International and managerial interviews. We find support for Pearce's arguments on the effects of governmental facilitation on managers' trust in their business partners, and for extensions of Molm's work on reciprocal exchange to international field settings. For the conflicting hypotheses, results support Pearce's arguments that the structural assurances of facilitative governments lead to higher levels of trust in business associates.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 118
页数:15
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1965, ECON SOC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ORG MANAGEMENT EMBRA, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410600783
[3]  
ARROW K, 1974, LIMIT ORG
[4]  
Bacharach S.B., 1981, Bargaining: Power, tactics, and outcomes
[5]  
Banfield EC., 1958, MORAL BASIS BACKWARD
[6]  
Barber B, 1983, The logic and limits of trust, V96
[7]   Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust [J].
Bigley, GA ;
Pearce, JL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :405-421
[8]  
Blau PM., 1964, Exchange and power in social life
[9]   THE IRON LAW OF FIEFS - BUREAUCRATIC FAILURE AND THE PROBLEM OF GOVERNANCE IN THE CHINESE ECONOMIC-REFORMS [J].
BOISOT, M ;
CHILD, J .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1988, 33 (04) :507-527
[10]   PRICE, AUTHORITY, AND TRUST - FROM IDEAL TYPES TO PLURAL FORMS [J].
BRADACH, JL ;
ECCLES, RG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1989, 15 :97-118