Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Using Lidocaine Patch 5% in Traumatic Rib Fractures

被引:45
|
作者
Ingalls, Nichole K. [1 ]
Horton, Zachary A. [1 ]
Bettendorf, Matthew [2 ]
Frye, Ira [1 ]
Rodriguez, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Grand Rapids Med Educ & Res Ctr, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[2] Cent Minnesota Surg, Gen & Bariatr Surg, Sartell, MN USA
关键词
LIDODERM; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The lidocaine patch 5% was developed to treat postherpetic neuralgia. Anecdotal experience at our institution suggests the lidocaine patch 5% decreases narcotic usage in patients with traumatic rib fractures. This trial was developed to define the patch's efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with rib fractures admitted to the trauma service at our Level I trauma center were enrolled and randomized in a 1 to 1 double-blind manner to receive a lidocaine patch 5% or placebo patch. Fifty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled from January 2007 to August 2008. Demographic and clinical information were recorded. The primary outcomes variable was total narcotic use, analyzed using the 1-tailed Mann-Whitney test. The secondary outcomes variables included non-narcotic pain medication, average pain score, pulmonary complications, and length of stay. Significance was defined based on a 1-sided test for the primary outcome and 2-sided tests for other comparisons, at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received the lidocaine patch 5% and 25 received the placebo patch. There were no significant differences in age, number of rib fractures, gender, trauma mechanism, preinjury lung disease, smoking history, percent of current smokers, and need for placement of chest tube between the lidocaine patch 5% and placebo groups. There was no difference between the lidocaine patch 5% and placebo groups, respectively, with regard to total IV narcotic usage: median, 0.23 units versus 0.26 units; total oral narcotics: median, 4 units versus 7 units; pain score: 5.6 +/- 0.4 versus 6.0 +/- 0.3 (mean +/- SEM); length of stay: 7.8 +/- 1.1 versus 6.2 +/- 0.7; or percentage of patients with pulmonary complications: 72.7% versus 72.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The lidocaine patch 5% does not significantly improve pain control in polytrauma patients with traumatic rib fractures. (J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:205-209. (C) 2010 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 209
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pregabalin for chronic cough due to lung cancer: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Noronha, Vanita
    Menon, Nandini
    Patil, Vijay M.
    Shah, Minit
    Joshi, Amit
    Shah, Srushti
    Nawale, Kavita
    Surve, Rohan
    Bafna, Gunj
    Jogdhankar, Shweta
    Shelar, Priyanka
    Shetake, Ankush
    Singh, Ashish
    Salian, Sushmita
    Jadhav, Pundlik
    Shah, Hetakshi
    Mer, Neha
    Vohra, Ananya
    Majumdar, Swaratika
    Banavali, Shripad
    Badwe, Rajendra
    Prabhash, Kumar
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2025, 132 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [32] Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Krogh, Thoger Persson
    Astrup, Jacob Kaae
    Kyed, Charlotte
    Fredberg, Ulrich
    TRANSLATIONAL SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (04) : 534 - 544
  • [33] Comparison of diphenhydramine and lidocaine for prevention of pain after injection of propofol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study
    Apiliogullari, S.
    Keles, B.
    Apiliogullari, B.
    Balasar, M.
    Yilmaz, H.
    Duman, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 24 (03) : 235 - 238
  • [34] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of duloxetine in Japanese fibromyalgia patients
    Murakami, Masato
    Osada, Kenichi
    Mizuno, Hiromichi
    Ochiai, Toshimitsu
    Alev, Levent
    Nishioka, Kusuki
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2015, 17
  • [35] 10% Lidocaine spray as a local anesthetic in blood gas sampling: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Gur, Ali
    Tekin, Erdal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 49 : 89 - 93
  • [36] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of pregabalin in the treatment of patients with Fibromyalgia
    Mease, Philip J.
    Russell, I. Jon
    Arnold, Lesley M.
    Florian, Hana
    Young, James P.
    Martin, Susan A.
    Sharma, Uma
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 35 (03) : 502 - 514
  • [37] Interferential current and photobiomodulation in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial
    Alqualo-Costa, Renata
    Rampazo, Erika Patricia
    Thome, Gustavo Ribeiro
    Perracini, Monica Rodrigues
    Liebano, Richard Eloin
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (10) : 1413 - 1427
  • [38] The Efficacy and Safety of Milnacipran for Treatment of Fibromyalgiae. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Mease, Philip J.
    Clauw, Daniel J.
    Gendreau, R. Michael
    Rao, Srinivas G.
    Kranzler, Jay
    Chen, Wei
    Palmer, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 36 (02) : 398 - 409
  • [39] Analgesic effect of gabapentin premedication in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Gregg, AK
    Francis, S
    Sharpe, P
    Rowbotham, DJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (01) : 174P - 174P
  • [40] Meralgia paresthetica: Nerve stimulator-guided injection with methylprednisolone/lidocaine, a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study
    Kloosterziel, Mark E.
    Tavy, Denes L. J.
    Arends, Samuel
    Zijdewind, Joyce M.
    van Zwet, Erik W.
    Wirtz, Paul W.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2020, 61 (06) : 788 - 791