Complications of scrotal surgery for benign conditions

被引:51
作者
Swartz, Mia A. [1 ]
Morgan, Todd M. [1 ]
Krieger, John N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
WINDOW OPERATION; HYDROCELE; SPERMATOCELECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES Frequent complications have been reported after scrotal surgery. We reviewed our experience to determine the complication rates, risk factors, and how our experience might differ from other series. METHODS We reviewed all scrotal surgery for benign conditions at the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System from 1998 to 2004. The abstracted data included indications, comorbidities, perioperative antimicrobial use, operative procedures, use of drains, and complications. RESULTS Ninety-five patients underwent 110 procedures, including hydrocelectomy (55%), spermatoce-lectomy (15%), epididymectomy (4%), and bilateral or combination procedures (27%). Preoperative antimicrobial administration was documented before 80 (73%) of the 110 procedures. The follow-up ranged from 0 to 85 months (mean 36). Complications occurred after 22 (20%) of the 110 procedures and included recurrences (6%), hematomas (5 %), and infections (3.6%), with 95% of complications occurring after hydrocelectomy (odds ratio 9.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 71.6). The potential patient and surgical risk factors considered were immunocompromised status, undergoing a bilateral procedure, a high American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and the use of drains. CONCLUSIONS Our overall complication rate was 20%, with most occurring after hydrocele surgery (chi-square, P = 0.01). The 3.6% wound infection rate was substantially tower than that in recent series in which preoperative antimicrobial agents were not prescribed. In the absence of a prospective clinical trial, these findings suggest that scrotal procedures might merit consideration of routine antimicrobial prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 619
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] LORDS PROCEDURE - THE BEST OPERATION FOR HYDROCELE
    ALBRECHT, W
    HOLTL, W
    AHARINEJAD, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 68 (02): : 187 - 189
  • [2] RESULTS OF WINDOW OPERATION FOR PRIMARY HYDROCELE
    JAHNSON, S
    JOHANSSON, JE
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1993, 41 (01) : 27 - 28
  • [3] A population based assessment of complications following outpatient hydrocelectomy and spermatocelectomy
    Kiddoo, DA
    Wollin, TA
    Mador, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) : 746 - 748
  • [4] The excisional, plication and internal drainage techniques: a comparison of the results for idiopathic hydrocele
    Ku, JH
    Kim, ME
    Lee, NK
    Park, YH
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 87 (01) : 82 - 84
  • [5] Lavelle MA, 1996, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V78, P541
  • [6] Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999
    Mangram, AJ
    Horan, TC
    Pearson, ML
    Silver, LC
    Jarvis, WR
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (04) : 250 - 278
  • [7] TURBAN SCROTAL DRESSING
    MANSON, AL
    MACDONALD, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (02) : 238 - 239
  • [8] Miroglu C., 1994, International Urology and Nephrology, V26, P673, DOI 10.1007/BF02767724
  • [9] WINDOW OPERATION - NEW TECHNIQUE FOR HYDROCELE
    NIGAM, VK
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1984, 24 (05) : 481 - 482
  • [10] THE OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF HYDROCELE - A COMPARISON OF 4 BASIC TECHNIQUES
    RODRIGUEZ, WC
    RODRIGUEZ, DD
    FORTUNO, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1981, 125 (06) : 804 - 805