Readmission and reoperation after midurethral sling

被引:9
|
作者
Hokenstad, Erik D. [1 ]
Glasgow, Amy E. [2 ]
Habermann, Elizabeth B. [2 ]
Occhino, John A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Urogynecol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deli, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Quality improvement readmission; Reoperation; Sling; Urinary incontinence; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; SURGERY; PROGRAM; TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-017-3551-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
We aimed to determine the rate of readmission and reoperation for patients undergoing midurethral sling (MUS) placement for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried to identify all isolated MUS placed from 2012 through 2015 using the Current Procedural Terminology 4 (CPT-4) code for MUS with or without cystoscopy (57,288 +/- 52,000). The cohort was then reviewed for unplanned, related readmissions and reoperations within 30 days of MUS placement. Isolated MUS was placed in 9910 patients. Fifty-eight (0.59%) patients were readmitted and 81 (0.82%) had reoperation. The most common indications for readmission were related to the urinary tract, i.e., urinary retention (27.6%), non-surgical-site-related infection (15.5%), and medical related issues (15.5%) The most common indications for reoperation were urinary tract (60.5%), gastrointestinal (7.4%), and gynecologic, i.e., examination under anesthesia (6.2%). Body mass index (BMI) was less (p = 0.001), and operative time (p = 0.014) and length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.001) longer in patients who were readmitted. Those who underwent reoperation had longer LOS than those who did not have reoperation (p < 0.001). Upon multivariate analysis, BMI < 25 (all p < 0.05) and longer LOS maintained statistical significance as risk factors for those who experienced readmission or reoperation (p = 0.0406, p < 0001). Isolated MUS placement has low 30-day readmission and reoperation rates. Increased LOS was associated with readmission, while increased LOS and BMI < 25 were associated with reoperation within 30 days.
引用
收藏
页码:1367 / 1370
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk Factors for De Novo Overactive Bladder After Midurethral Sling
    Serna-Gallegos, Tasha
    Dutta, Sonia
    Crowder, Carly
    Wadensweiler, Paul
    Whitcomb, Emily L.
    Guaderrama, Noelani M.
    UROGYNECOLOGY, 2024, 30 (01): : 59 - 64
  • [22] Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling
    Dave, Bhumy A.
    Jaber, Camaleigh
    Leader-Cramer, Alix
    Higgins, Nicole
    Mueller, Margaret
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Kenton, Kimberly
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (09) : 1327 - 1332
  • [23] Female Sexual Dysfunction Management After Pubovaginal/Midurethral Sling Surgery
    Dominic Lee
    Philippe E. Zimmern
    Current Sexual Health Reports, 2014, 6 (3) : 184 - 191
  • [24] Effect of pregnancy and delivery on urinary incontinence after the midurethral sling procedure
    Cavkaytar, Sabri
    Kokanali, Mahmut Kuntay
    Ozer, Irfan
    Erkilinc, Selcuk
    Aksakal, Orhan Seyfi
    Doganay, Melike
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (05) : 693 - 698
  • [25] Sexual activity and function in women more than 2 years after midurethral sling placement
    Zyczynski, Halina M.
    Rickey, Leslie
    Dyer, Keisha Y.
    Wilson, Tracey
    Stoddard, Anne M.
    Gormley, E. Ann
    Hsu, Yvonne
    Kusek, John W.
    Brubaker, Linda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (05)
  • [26] Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: tape tightening or repeat sling?
    Han, Ji-Yeon
    Moon, Kyung Hyun
    Park, Chang Myeon
    Choo, Myung-Soo
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (09) : 1279 - 1284
  • [27] Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study
    Linder, Brian J.
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Leon, Daniel A. Carranza
    Trabuco, Emanuel C.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (09) : 1321 - 1326
  • [28] A Case Report of an Unusual Bladder Outlet Obstruction After Midurethral Sling Placement and Review of the Literature
    Abdulla, Wafa
    Kuhn, Annette
    Mueller, Michael D.
    Hoehn, Diana
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2024, 46 (01) : 1983 - 1986
  • [29] Prevention, diagnosis, and management of midurethral mesh sling complications
    Hengel, A. Ross
    Carlson, Kevin V.
    Baverstock, Richard J.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (06): : S135 - S140
  • [30] Readjustable midurethral sling (REMEEX system) in obese women
    Kim, Woong Bin
    Lee, Sang Wook
    Lee, Kwang Woo
    Kim, Jun Mo
    Kim, Young Ho
    Kim, Min Eui
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2019, 60 (06) : 488 - 495