Readmission and reoperation after midurethral sling

被引:9
|
作者
Hokenstad, Erik D. [1 ]
Glasgow, Amy E. [2 ]
Habermann, Elizabeth B. [2 ]
Occhino, John A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Urogynecol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deli, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Quality improvement readmission; Reoperation; Sling; Urinary incontinence; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; SURGERY; PROGRAM; TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-017-3551-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
We aimed to determine the rate of readmission and reoperation for patients undergoing midurethral sling (MUS) placement for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried to identify all isolated MUS placed from 2012 through 2015 using the Current Procedural Terminology 4 (CPT-4) code for MUS with or without cystoscopy (57,288 +/- 52,000). The cohort was then reviewed for unplanned, related readmissions and reoperations within 30 days of MUS placement. Isolated MUS was placed in 9910 patients. Fifty-eight (0.59%) patients were readmitted and 81 (0.82%) had reoperation. The most common indications for readmission were related to the urinary tract, i.e., urinary retention (27.6%), non-surgical-site-related infection (15.5%), and medical related issues (15.5%) The most common indications for reoperation were urinary tract (60.5%), gastrointestinal (7.4%), and gynecologic, i.e., examination under anesthesia (6.2%). Body mass index (BMI) was less (p = 0.001), and operative time (p = 0.014) and length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.001) longer in patients who were readmitted. Those who underwent reoperation had longer LOS than those who did not have reoperation (p < 0.001). Upon multivariate analysis, BMI < 25 (all p < 0.05) and longer LOS maintained statistical significance as risk factors for those who experienced readmission or reoperation (p = 0.0406, p < 0001). Isolated MUS placement has low 30-day readmission and reoperation rates. Increased LOS was associated with readmission, while increased LOS and BMI < 25 were associated with reoperation within 30 days.
引用
收藏
页码:1367 / 1370
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readmission and reoperation after midurethral sling
    Erik D. Hokenstad
    Amy E. Glasgow
    Elizabeth B. Habermann
    John A. Occhino
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2018, 29 : 1367 - 1370
  • [2] Surgeon volume and reoperation risk after midurethral sling surgery
    Berger, Alexander A.
    Tan-Kim, Jasmine
    Menefee, Shawn A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (05)
  • [3] Mortality and Reoperation Following Midurethral Sling Versus Urethral Bulking in Older Women
    Cadish, Lauren A.
    Ford, Cassie B.
    Wu, Jennifer M.
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 165 : 144 - 149
  • [4] Urodynamics for incontinence after midurethral sling removal
    Coskun, Burhan
    Lavelle, Rebecca S.
    Alhalabi, Feras
    Lemack, Gary
    Zimmern, Philippe E.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2016, 35 (08) : 939 - 943
  • [5] Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation
    Propst, Katie
    O'Sullivan, David M.
    Tulikangas, Paul K.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (10) : 1463 - 1467
  • [6] A Midurethral Sling to Reduce Incontinence after Vaginal Prolapse Repair
    Wei, John T.
    Nygaard, Ingrid
    Richter, Holly E.
    Nager, Charles W.
    Barber, Matthew D.
    Kenton, Kim
    Amundsen, Cindy L.
    Schaffer, Joseph
    Meikle, Susan F.
    Spino, Cathie
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (25) : 2358 - 2367
  • [7] Pain after midurethral sling; the underestimated role of mesh removal
    Mengerink, Bianca B.
    Aourag, Nassim
    Kluivers, Kirsten B.
    Notten, Kim J. B.
    Heesakkers, John P. F. A.
    Martens, Frank M. J.
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 74 (04) : 541 - 546
  • [8] COMPLICATIONS OF MIDURETHRAL SLING OPERATIONS
    Gungor Ugurlucan, Funda
    Erturk, Emircan
    Yasa, Cenk
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2019, 82 (04): : 229 - 235
  • [9] Duration of Catheterization After Retropubic Midurethral Sling
    Geynisman-Tan, Julia
    Dave-Heliker, Bhumy
    Bochenska, Katarzyna
    Collins, Sarah
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Mueller, Margaret
    Kenton, Kimberly
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (05): : 369 - 371
  • [10] Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Hokenstad, Erik D.
    Glasgow, Amy E.
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Occhino, John A.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 23 (02): : 131 - 135