Nationwide survey of hip fractures in Japan

被引:56
作者
Hagino, H
Nakamura, T
Sakamoto, K
Yamamoto, K
Endo, N
Mori, S
Mutoh, Y
Yamamoto, S
Harada, A
Kushida, K
Tanizawa, T
Hotokebuchi, T
Takaoka, K
Tomita, K
Kawai, S
Takahashi, HE
Inoue, T
Kurokawa, T
Yamamto, H
机构
[1] Tottori Univ Hosp, Rehabil Div, Yonago, Tottori 6838504, Japan
[2] Univ Occupat & Environm Hlth, Dept Orthoped, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Showa Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Niigata Univ, Div Orthoped Surg, Niigata, Japan
[5] Kagawaw Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kanagawa, Japan
[6] Univ Tokyo, Dept Phys & Hlth Educ, Grad Sch Educ, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatr Med Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[8] Chubu Natl Hosp, Aichi, Japan
[9] Hamamatsu Univ Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Shizuoka, Japan
[10] Shinrakuen Hosp, Niigata, Japan
[11] Saga Med Sch, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Saga, Japan
[12] Osaka City Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka 558, Japan
[13] Kanazawa Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920, Japan
[14] Yamaguchi Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Yamaguchi 753, Japan
[15] Hamamatsu Univ Sch Med, Shizuoka, Japan
[16] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
[17] Kochi Med Sch, Kochi, Japan
关键词
hip fracture; epidemiology; treatment;
D O I
10.1007/s00776-003-0741-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To elucidate the current status of hip fracture incidence and treatment in Japan, a tally of hip fractures in patients from 1998 to 2000 was conducted in Japanese Orthopaedic Association-related hospitals. Response rates were from 40.5% to 55.6% in each observation year. The survey found a total of 110747 new hip fractures aged 35 years old and over during the survey years. Age- and gender-specific number of patients increased with age and peaked at the age of 80-84 years, then leveled off after 85 years of age. The number of patients with femoral neck fractures exceeded that with trochanteric fractures before 75 years of age, and these figures became inverted thereafter. More left hips were fractured than right in all survey years; however, the difference was not significant. The most common cause of hip fractures was a simple fall; 68.8% sustained fractures indoors, and there was a significant monthly variation. Ninety-three percent of the patients with femoral neck fractures and 94% of the patients with trochanteric fractures were treated surgically, and about three fourths were treated with hemiarthroplasty among patients with femoral neck fractures. The mean hospitalization period was 56.4 days during the observation period.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Beck T S, 1996, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V25, P608
  • [2] THE COSTS AND EFFECTS OF EARLY DISCHARGE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF FRACTURED HIP
    FARNWORTH, MG
    KENNY, P
    SHIELL, A
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 1994, 23 (03) : 190 - 194
  • [3] Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: Risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly
    Greenspan, SL
    Myers, ER
    Kiel, DP
    Parker, RA
    Hayes, WC
    Resnick, NM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 104 (06) : 539 - 545
  • [4] World-wide projections for hip fracture
    Gullberg, B
    Johnell, O
    Kanis, JA
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 7 (05) : 407 - 413
  • [5] Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori prefecture, Japan
    Hagino, H
    Yamamoto, K
    Ohshiro, H
    Nakamura, T
    Kishimoto, H
    Nose, T
    [J]. BONE, 1999, 24 (03) : 265 - 270
  • [6] HAGINO H, 2000, CENT JPN J ORTHOP TR, V43, P881
  • [7] LAU EMC, 1995, AUST J PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, P76
  • [8] Inclement weather and the risk of hip fracture
    Levy, AR
    Bensimon, DR
    Mayo, NE
    Leighton, HG
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [9] MAUTALEN CA, 1996, BONE, V18, P133
  • [10] The incidence of cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in 1999 in Niigata Prefecture, Japan
    Morita, Y
    Endo, N
    Iga, T
    Tokunaga, K
    Ohkawa, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2002, 20 (05) : 311 - 318