Prognostic Factors, Response to Treatment, and Survival in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Blast Phase: A Single-Institution Survey

被引:12
|
作者
Perez-Jacobo, Fernando [1 ]
Tuna-Aguilar, Elena [1 ]
Demichelis-Gomez, Roberta [1 ]
Crespo-Solis, Erick [1 ]
Valencia-Rocha, Ubaldo [1 ]
Aguayo, Alvaro [1 ]
Lopez-Karpovitch, Xavier [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Chron Leukemia Clin, Tlalpan, Mexico
关键词
Characteristics; Chronic myeloid leukemia blast phase (CML-BP); Cytogenetic; Immunophenotype; Treatment; CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA; CHRONIC GRANULOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA; FOLLOW-UP; IMATINIB-RESISTANT; CRISIS; MITOXANTRONE; DIAGNOSIS; CML; TRANSFORMATION; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.clml.2015.09.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We retrospectively analyzed data from 51 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase (BP) at a single institution. Disease characteristics and prognostic factors are described. Lymphoid BP and use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors were independent prognostic factors for response. Age, hemoglobin level, and chromosomal aberrations were identified as prognostic factors for overall survival. Introduction: Data from 51 patients (23 women) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast phase (BP) were analyzed in order to identify prognostic factors for complete hematologic response (CHR) and survival. Patients and Methods: Forty-four patients experienced disease progression from chronic or accelerated phase, and 7 cases presented as CML-BP. Thirteen patients (25.5%) had extramedullary involvement at diagnosis, and 71% were myeloid BP. Clonal evolution was identified in 53% of the cases, and the abnormalities most frequently observed were isochromosome (17q), double Philadelphia chromosome, and trisomy 8. Forty-five patients received treatment: 60% chemotherapy (CT) alone and 40% CT plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or TKI alone; 42% of them experienced CHR. Results: Median overall survival (OS) in patients whose disease responded to treatment was 7 months (95% confidence interval, 1.7-6.2 months), with a median disease-free survival of 5 months (95% confidence interval, 2.85.8 months). One out of 3 patients who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation remains alive. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphoid BP and TKI therapy had a statistically significant positive impact as prognostic factors for CHR. In the multivariate analysis, age > 60 years, hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, and complex karyotype were statistically significant negative prognostic factors for OS. There was no statistical significant difference in OS between patients who received only CT (1988-2002) with those treated with CT plus TKI (2003-2013). Conclusion: This is the first study in Mexico to report prognostic factors associated with CHR and OS in patients with CML-BP. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 784
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EUTOS score predicts survival and cytogenetic response in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with first-line imatinib
    Tao, Zhonfei
    Liu, Bingcheng
    Zhao, Yaozhong
    Wang, Ying
    Zhang, Rongli
    Han, Mingzhe
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Chengwen
    Ru, Kun
    Mi, Yingchang
    Wang, Jianxiang
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2014, 38 (09) : 1030 - 1035
  • [22] Treatment Outcome and Prognostic Factors for Patients with Bone-Only Metastases of Breast Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis
    Niikura, Naoki
    Liu, Jun
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Palla, Shana L.
    Tokuda, Yutaka
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    Ueno, Naoto T.
    Theriault, Richard L.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (02) : 155 - 164
  • [23] Curative radiotherapy in patients with anal cancer: clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in a single-institution experience
    Osti, M. F.
    Agolli, L.
    Scaringi, C.
    Bracci, S.
    Minniti, G.
    Enrici, R. Maurizi
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (05): : 882 - 894
  • [24] Prognostic Factors, Survival Analysis and Cytogenetic Outcomes in Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A single Center Results
    Teke, Hava U.
    Davutoglu, Nur O.
    Gunduz, Eren
    Andic, Neslihan
    Bal, Cengiz
    Aras, Beyhan D.
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2017, 27 (03): : 150 - 160
  • [25] Favorable transplantation outcome of patients with de novo chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase (lymphoid and myeloid)
    Sasaki, Koji
    CANCER, 2025, 131 (01)
  • [26] Chronic myeloid leukemia patients and treatment-free remission attitudes: a multicenter survey
    Lou, Jin
    Huang, Junjie
    Wang, Zitong
    Wen, Bingbing
    Tu, Chuanqing
    Huang, Wangxiang
    Zhai, Zhimin
    Du, Xin
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2018, 12 : 1025 - 1032
  • [27] Extramedullary sudden blast crisis in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia during first-line treatment with nilotinib
    Angelopoulou, M. K.
    Asimakopoulos, J. V.
    Galani, Z.
    Levidou, G.
    Roumelioti, M.
    Vassilakopoulos, T. P.
    Korkolopoulou, P.
    Panayiotidis, P.
    BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL, 2016, 6 : e461 - e461
  • [28] Possible implication of IKAROS gene deletion and BCR-ABL1 variants in progression of chronic myeloid leukemia to lymphoid blast crisis in childhood: a single-institution experience
    Moschovi, Maria
    Adamaki, Maria
    Athanasiadou, Anastasia
    Divane, Aspasia
    Karytianou, Anna
    Tourkantoni, Natalia
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2015, 56 (08) : 2460 - 2462
  • [29] Development of a predictive population survival model according to the cytogenetic response rate for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase
    Schrover, Rudolf J.
    Adena, Michael A.
    De Abreu Lourenco, Richard
    Prince, H. Miles
    Seymour, John F.
    Wonder, Michael J.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2006, 47 (06) : 1069 - 1081
  • [30] Chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis: Retrospective analysis of prognostic factors in 90 patients
    Griesshammer, M
    Heinze, B
    Hellmann, A
    Popp, C
    Anger, B
    Heil, G
    Bangerter, M
    Heimpel, H
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 1996, 73 (05) : 225 - 230