Normative Rule Extraction from Implicit Learning into Explicit Representation

被引:0
|
作者
Kadir, Mohd Rashdan Abdul [1 ]
Selamat, Ali [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Krejcar, Ondrej [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Engn, Sch Comp, Johor Baharu 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Malaysia Japan Int Inst Technol MJIIT, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
[3] Univ Hradec Kralove, Fac Informat & Management, Rokitanskeho62, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic
来源
KNOWLEDGE INNOVATION THROUGH INTELLIGENT SOFTWARE METHODOLOGIES, TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES (SOMET_20) | 2020年 / 327卷
关键词
Multi-agent; Norm Synthesis; Norm Detection; Norm Representation; Deontic; Reinforcement learning; Q-learning; Sequential Decision Making; OpenAiGym; Rule Extraction; State Abstraction; NORMS;
D O I
10.3233/FAIA200555
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Normative multi-agent research is an alternative viewpoint in the design of adaptive autonomous agent architecture. Norms specify the standards of behaviors such as which actions or states should be achieved or avoided. The concept of norm synthesis is the process of generating useful normative rules. This study proposes a model for normative rule extraction from implicit learning, namely using the Q-learning algorithm, into explicit norm representation by implementing Dynamic Deontics and Hierarchical Knowledge Base (HKB) to synthesize useful normative rules in the form of weighted state-action pairs with deontic modality. OpenAi Gym is used to simulate the agent environment. Our proposed model is able to generate both obligative and prohibitive norms as well as deliberate and execute said norms. Results show the generated norms are best used as prior knowledge to guide agent behavior and performs poorly if not complemented by another agent coordination mechanism. Performance increases when using both obligation and prohibition norms, and in general, norms do speed up optimum policy reachability.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 101
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The interaction of implicit learning, explicit hypothesis testing learning and implicit-to-explicit knowledge extraction
    Sun, Ron
    Zhang, Xi
    Slusarz, Paul
    Mathews, Robert
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2007, 20 (01) : 34 - 47
  • [2] Learning: Rule extraction and representation
    Carlson, RA
    CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY-APA REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2000, 45 (06): : 630 - 632
  • [3] Neural Vector Fields: Implicit Representation by Explicit Learning
    Yang, Xianghui
    Lin, Guosheng
    Chen, Zhenghao
    Zhou, Luping
    2023 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2023, : 16727 - 16738
  • [4] Concept Representation by Learning Explicit and Implicit Concept Couplings
    Lu, Wenpeng
    Zhang, Yuteng
    Wang, Shoujin
    Huang, Heyan
    Liu, Qian
    Luo, Sheng
    IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 36 (01) : 6 - 15
  • [5] Influence of rule complexity on implicit and explicit learning of a tracking task
    Sekiya, H
    Fukuchi, K
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 26 : S165 - S166
  • [6] PolyCL: contrastive learning for polymer representation learning via explicit and implicit augmentations
    Zhou, Jiajun
    Yang, Yijie
    Mroz, Austin M.
    Jelfs, Kim E.
    DIGITAL DISCOVERY, 2025, 4 (01): : 149 - 160
  • [7] ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MODES IN THE LEARNING OF A COMPLEX RULE STRUCTURE
    REBER, AS
    KASSIN, SM
    LEWIS, S
    CANTOR, G
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1980, 6 (05): : 492 - 502
  • [8] SYNTHETIC GRAMMAR LEARNING - IMPLICIT RULE ABSTRACTION OR EXPLICIT FRAGMENTARY KNOWLEDGE
    PERRUCHET, P
    PACTEAU, C
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1990, 119 (03) : 264 - 275
  • [9] The explicit and implicit in the normative sources of Mendiant architecture
    Volti, P
    BIBLIOTHEQUE DE L ECOLE DES CHARTES, 2004, 162 (01): : 51 - +
  • [10] LEARNING FROM EXPLICIT VERSUS IMPLICIT TEXTS
    FRANKS, JJ
    VYE, NJ
    AUBLE, PM
    MEZYNSKI, KJ
    PERFETTO, GA
    BRANSFORD, JD
    STEIN, BS
    LITTLEFIELD, J
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1982, 111 (04) : 414 - 422