The influence of anesthesia on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgeries

被引:6
|
作者
Benuska, J. [1 ]
Plisova, M. [1 ]
Zabka, M. [1 ]
Horvath, J. [1 ]
Tisovsky, P. [1 ]
Novorolsky, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Ruzinovska 6, SK-82606 Bratislava, Slovakia
来源
BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY | 2019年 / 120卷 / 10期
关键词
neuromonitoring; MEP; motor evoked potential; spinal deformity; anesthesia; propofol; sufentanil; ketamine; amplitude; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRIC MOTOR; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CORTEX STIMULATION; PROPOFOL; KETAMINE; ISOFLURANE; SCOLIOSIS; INCREASES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.4149/BLL_2019_133
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring using tc-MEPs satisfactorily detects motor tract integrity changes during spinal surgery. However, tc-MEP is affected by anesthesia and other factors, in which the stimulation threshold increases because the waveform amplitude decreases over time with the accumulation and boluses of anesthetics. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 139 patients. The average age was 30 years. Tc-MEPs were recorded bilaterally from the tibialis anterior muscle and the abductor hallucis muscle. Statistical tests were used to investigate the changes to evaluate anesthetic effects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in tc-MEP amplitude change (%) between the groups of propofol (13 %), remifentanil (22 %) and sufentanil (26 %, p < 0.01). Significant differences were found between the groups of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil (20 %) and bolus sufentanil (-30 %), and bolus ketamine (730 %, p < 0.008). Major differences were observed between bolus sufentanil (-30 %) and bolus ketamine (730 %, p < 0.001). When comparing tc-MEPs with no amplitude, no significant difference was found between the groups of propofol (26 %), remifentanil (24 %), and sufentanil (28 %, p < 0.007). Substantial difference was found between the groups of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil (mean 26 %) and the group where ketamine boluses were administered. We didn't observe any loss of amplitude (0 %, p < 0.0002). CONCLUSION: IONM may be useless in patients where boluses of sufentanil are administered and also with Medical Research Council grades 3 and below. Consider applying IONM in patients with severe spinal deformity along with a higher age of over 50 and neurological deficit. Increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of tc-MEP. Our concept of findings supports the neurophysiological monitoring findings in other studies (Tab. 10, Ref. 45).
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 801
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Low dose propofol as a supplement to ketamine-based anesthesia during intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials
    Kawaguchi, M
    Sakamoto, T
    Inoue, S
    Kakimoto, M
    Furuya, H
    Morimoto, T
    Sakaki, T
    SPINE, 2000, 25 (08) : 974 - 979
  • [42] Impact of anesthesia on transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: a review of the literature
    Wang, Anthony C.
    Than, Khoi D.
    Etame, Arnold B.
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2009, 27 (04) : E7.1 - E7.4
  • [43] Intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring in spinal tumor surgery: sirens or indispensable tools?
    Scibilia, Antonino
    Terranova, Carmen
    Rizzo, Vincenzo
    Raffa, Giovanni
    Morelli, Adolfo
    Esposito, Felice
    Mallamace, Raffaella
    Buda, Gaetano
    Conti, Alfredo
    Quartarone, Angelo
    Germano, Antonino
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2016, 41 (02)
  • [44] Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring Clinical article
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley O.
    Leick, Katie M.
    Bender, Sarah M.
    Greenlee, Jeremy D. W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 16 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [45] The Influence of Anesthesia on Neuromonitoring During Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Reysner, Malgorzata
    Reysner, Tomasz
    Janusz, Piotr
    Kowalski, Grzegorz
    Geisler-Wojciechowska, Alicja
    Grochowicka, Monika
    Pyszczorska, Monika
    Mularski, Aleksander
    Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna
    NEUROSCI, 2024, 5 (04): : 693 - 712
  • [46] Protection of the remaining spinal cord function with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during paraparetic scoliosis surgery: a case report
    Zhengyong Chen
    Joel Lerman
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2012, 26 : 13 - 16
  • [47] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: A review focus on the corticospinal tracts
    Deletis, Vedran
    Sala, Francesco
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (02) : 248 - 264
  • [48] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches
    Fabio Cofano
    Francesco Zenga
    Marco Mammi
    Roberto Altieri
    Nicola Marengo
    Marco Ajello
    Paolo Pacca
    Antonio Melcarne
    Carola Junemann
    Alessandro Ducati
    Diego Garbossa
    Neurosurgical Review, 2019, 42 : 297 - 307
  • [49] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: methods in neurosurgery
    Urriza, J.
    Imirizaldu, L.
    Pabon, R. M.
    Olaziregi, O.
    Garcia de Gurtubay, I.
    ANALES DEL SISTEMA SANITARIO DE NAVARRA, 2009, 32 : 115 - 124
  • [50] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches
    Cofano, Fabio
    Zenga, Francesco
    Mammi, Marco
    Altieri, Roberto
    Marengo, Nicola
    Ajello, Marco
    Pacca, Paolo
    Melcarne, Antonio
    Junemann, Carola
    Ducati, Alessandro
    Garbossa, Diego
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 42 (02) : 297 - 307